Skip to main content

Table 4 Percentage of non-integrated and integrated facilities and clients meeting each QIQ Indicator (Malawi SPA 2013–2014)

From: Quality of family planning services in HIV integrated and non-integrated health facilities in Malawi and Tanzania

Indicator#

Description

Non-Integrated

Integrated

Total

p-value

Facility-level Inventory (n = 305)

%

%

%

 

11

Provider (at facility) follows infection control procedures outlined in guidelines

60

63

61

0.620

18

Facility has all (approved) methods available; no stockouts

46

58

50

0.039

19

Facility has basic items needed for delivery of methods available through facility (sterilizing equipment, gloves, blood pressure cuff, specula, adequate lighting, water)

36

35

36

0.902

21

Facility has mechanisms to make programmatic changes based on client feedback

25

30

27

0.370

22

Facility has received a supervisory visit in past 6 monthsa

64

80

71

0.003

23

Facility has adequate storage of contraceptives and medicines (away from water, heat, direct sunlight) on premises

69

78

72

0.087

24

Facility has state-of-the-art clinical guidelines

45

48

46

0.629

Client-level FP Observation (n = 323)

1a

Look and write on client record

84

96

89

0.005

1b

Used any visual aids

20

21

20

0.907

1c

Ensured visual and auditory privacy

90

82

87

0.334

2

Provider assures client of confidentiality

32

22

28

0.266

3

Provider asks client about reproductive intentions

29

26

28

0.688

5

Provider mentions HIV/AIDS (initiates or responds)

8

15

11

0.207

6

Provider discusses dual method use

6

15

10

0.095

9

Provider gives accurate information on the method accepted (how to use, side effects, complications)b

57

63

60

0.552

10

Provider gives instruction on when to return

84

94

88

0.050

13

Provider performs clinical procedures according to guidelinesc

57

60

58

0.795

15

Client participates actively in discussion and selection of method (i.e. is “empowered”)

42

47

44

0.633

Client-level FP Exit Interview (n = 315)

4

Provider discusses with client which method she would prefer

35

32

34

0.635

8

Provider tailors key information to the particular needs of the specific client

93

91

92

0.546

14

Staff treats client with dignity and respectd

99

98

99

0.236

25

Waiting time acceptable

87

85

86

0.732

  1. aFor this study, the cut-off was set at 6 months
  2. bNine cases did not obtain a method and were, therefore, excluded
  3. cForty-six cases did not undergo a clinical procedure and were, therefore, excluded
  4. dOne case did not provide information for this indicator and was, therefore, excluded