↑ Inductive | Step 1 | Self-acquainting with the data, by reading and rereading of the transcripts [JH, NS, SA, YD, ME] |
Step 2 | Line-by-line analysis and inductive coding by three researchers independently [NS, SA, YD]. [NS] and [YD] performed the coding process directly after the focus group discussions, while [SA] performed the coding process later. Open codes with a low interpretation degree were applied | |
Step 3 | Merging of similar codes by one researcher [SA] by which the quantity of the codes was reduced | |
Step 4 | Excluding codes with no relation with the family planning decision-making process by two researchers [JH, SA]. A step known as selective coding | |
Deductive ↓ | Step 5 | The selective codes were applied to the “Narrative Framework” (29) by two researchers independently [SA, JH] |
Step 6 | A within-person analysis was performed by charting the selective codes for every participant individually in the framework. This was done by two researchers separately [JH, SA]. Codes that were not applicable to the preexisting themes (shadow of the past and shadow of the future) were discussed during group meetings and later identified as new themes (shadow of the present and reflections) | |
Step 7 | A between-person analysis was carried out through axial coding by two researchers individually [JH, SA], producing categories. Categories were discussed in several group meetings resulting in a new framework visualizing four overarching themes and several categories |