Skip to main content

Table 3 Mode of treatment for interstitial pregnancy

From: A 20 year experience in the management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies in a tertiary hospital – a retrospective review

Mode of treatment

Number

Success (%)

Size of sac, mm (range)

Fetal pole evident

n (%)

CRL, range

Fetal cardiac activity evident

n (%)

Initial hCG range (IU/L)

Secondary treatment / complications

Success

Failed

Expectant

14

13 (92.9%)

4–33

2 (14.3%)

4-6 mm

0 (0%)

307–51869

416

1 case – IM MTX for static hCG

Intramuscular MTX

3

3 (100%)

5–30

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

3485–5605

/

/

Intralesional MTX

30

22 (73.3%)

6–78

15 (50.0%)

2-12 mm

11 (36.7%)

2094–80805

9416–79,548

3 cases – 2nd dose intralesional MTX for rising hCG / persistent FH

1 case – laparoscopic cornual resection for rising hCG and abdominal pain

1 case – IM MTX for static hCG

2 cases – laparotomy for shock

1 case – laparoscopy for abd pain

Transvaginal aspiration of ectopic sac with KCl injection

1

1 (100%)

2.4

1 (100%)

7 mm

0 (0%)

n/a (heterotopic pregnancy)

/

/

Salpingotomy

12

11 (91.7%)

15–58

4 (33.3%)

6-23 mm

3 (25.0%)

331–37,721

9473

1 case—IM MTX for residual ectopic pregnancy

Salpingectomy / Cornual resection

26

25 (96.2%)

10–33

8 (30.8%)

3-60 mm

6 (23.1%)

541–38,584

12,348

1 case – IM MTX for static hCG

Further management in private

1

Unknown

/

/

/

Unknown

Unknown

/

  1. MTX Methotrexate, UAE Uterine artery embolization