Skip to main content

Table 12 Discomfort by Condom Type and Gender

From: Clinical breakage, slippage and acceptability of two commercial ultra-thin polyurethane male condoms compared to a commercial thin latex condom: a randomised, masked, 3 way crossover, multi centre controlled study (SAGCS 2)

 

Male

  

Female

  
 

PU A

PU B

Latex C

PU A

PU B

Latex C

 

n = 186

n = 282

n = 171

n = 151

n = 110

n = 161

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

Discomfort experienced

14

22

132

12

9

122

Type

      

 Burning

0

0

0

1

1

22

 Irritation

0

1

0

2

2

4

 Itching

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Rash

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Constriction

7

14

6

NA

NA

NA

 Decreased sensitivity

3

5

5

1

2

2

 Dryness

2

1

1

6

4

4

 Other

1

1

0

1

0

0

Severity

      

 Mild

6

11

72

7

7

7

 Moderate

7

7

4

4

24

35

 Severe

2

3

1

0

2

11

Duration

      

 Only while wearing condom

13

20

122

10

7

82

 1–10 min after condom removed

1

1

1

2

1

3

 11–59 min after condom removed

0

0

0

0

0

1

  > 59 min

0

0

0

0

0

1

Cause

      

 Unknown

5

5

02

4

4

6

 Inadequate lubrication

1

1

0

4

2

2

 Rubbing, friction

0

0

0

1

1

1

 Fit too tight

6

12

0

0

0

0

 Fit too loose

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Fit problem

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Sensitivity to condom

0

0

0

0

1

0

 Ring too tight

0

1

0

NA

NA

NA

 Texture

0

1

0

1

1

1

 Sensitivity to added lubricant

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Prolonged intercourse

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Unspecified condom cause

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Other condom cause

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Other medical problem

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Other non-condom cause

0

0

0

3

0

0

 Other reason

0

0

0

0

0

0

  1. 1Includes all subjects exposed to Study condom
  2. 2Chi-square statistically different: p-value < 0·05