Clinical breakage, slippage and acceptability of two commercial ultra-thin polyurethane male condoms compared to a commercial thin latex condom: a randomised, masked, 3 way crossover, multi centre controlled study (SAGCS 2)

Table 2 Number and percent of couples by data completion status

	Couples
	n	%
Total enrolled	300	100.0
Exited early	44	14.7
No longer with Study partner	14	4·7
Study complaint¹	2	0·7
Moved out of area	2	0·7
Condom discomfort	2	0·7
Disliked Study condoms	3	1·0
Unrelated health problem	3	1·0
Did not use last condom set before end of follow-up period	1	0·3
Eligibility issue²	1	0·3
Personal reason³	13	4·3
Lost to follow-up	3	1·0
Completed study⁴	256	85.3

¹Study takes too much time, too many visits, etc.
²Male partner reported history of latex allergy after receiving first set of condoms, did not use any Study condoms
³Examples include new job, no sex, too busy/no time for Study, personal problems, lost interest in Study
⁴Used at least one condom of each type

ISSN: 1742-4755