Skip to main content

Table 7 Profile of Condom Use (Note: PU = Polyurethane)

From: Clinical breakage, slippage and acceptability of two commercial ultra-thin polyurethane male condoms compared to a commercial thin latex condom: a randomised, masked, 3 way crossover, multi centre controlled study (SAGCS 2)

 

PU A

PU B

Latex C

 

n

%

n

%

n

%

Condoms available for use

1500

 

1500

 

1500

 

Total condoms not opened/recorded

195

13.0

191

12.7

180

12.0

Due to early discontinuation1

160

10.7

150

10.0

155

10.3

Due to personal reasons

30

2.0

34

2.3

23

1.5

Due to failure to use condom per protocol 2

5

0.3

5

0.3

0

0.0

Due to uninterpretable condom report

0

0.0

2

0.1

2

0.1

Total condoms opened & recorded

1305

87.0

1309

87.3

1320

88.0

Not used for vaginal intercourse

85

6.5

126

9.6

53

4.0

Defective

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

Tore while unwrapping

1

0.1

0

0.0

0

0.0

Could not unroll condom fully onto penis

51

3.9

98

7.5

21

1.6

Tore while donning

0

0.0

3

0.2

4

0.3

Condom too tight

14

1.1

13

1.0

6

0.5

Other reason

3

0.2

3

0.2

1

0.1

Used sharp object to unwrap condom3

2

0.2

1

0.1

0

0.0

Used for anal intercourse3

4

0.3

0

0.0

2

0.2

Used for oral intercourse3

3

0.2

3

0.2

9

0.7

Used non-Study lubricant3

7

0.5

5

0.4

10

0.8

Evaluable condom uses

1221

93·6

1183

90·4

1268

96·1

Failed during intercourse

31

2.5

36

3.0

16

1.3

Clinical break

18

1.5

22

1.9

10

0.89

Clinical Slippage

13

1.1

14

1.2

6

0.5

Did not fail during intercourse

1190

97·5

1147

97·0

1252

98·7

Tore during removal

1

0.1

1

0.1

0

0.0

Removed intact

1189

99·9

1146

99·9

1252

100·0