From: Kenya’s 2010 abortion law impacts contraceptive use and fertility rates
Model one (no imputation) | Model two (imputed) | |
---|---|---|
Use of modern contraception | Adjusted Odds Ratios (95% CI) | Adjusted Odds Ratios (95% CI) |
Effect of change of abortion law (intervention group*post intervention period) | ||
Old abortion law | Ref | Ref |
New abortion law | 1.22 (1.11, 1.34)*** | 1.24 (1.15, 1.34)*** |
Control variables | ||
Number of living children | 1.15 (1.13, 1.16)*** | 1.14 (1.13, 1.15)*** |
Age in years | 0.98 (0.97, 0.98)*** | 0.98 (0.97, 0.98)*** |
Residence | ||
Urban | Ref | Ref |
Rural | 0.86 (0.81, 0.91)*** | 0.87 (0.82, 0.93)*** |
Educational level | ||
No education | Ref | Ref |
Primary education | 2.12 (1.97, 2.25)*** | 1.85 (1.73, 1.99)*** |
Secondary education | 2.53 (2.32, 2.76)*** | 2.33 (2.13, 2.54)*** |
Higher education | 3.13 (2.78, 3.53)*** | 3.00 (2.67, 3.37)*** |
Wealth index | ||
Poorest | Ref | Ref |
Poorer | 1.54 (1.44, 1.65)*** | 1.44 (1.34, 1.55)*** |
Middle | 1.87 (1.74, 2.00)*** | 1.70 (1.58, 1.82)*** |
Richer | 2.19 (2.03, 2.36)*** | 2.04 (1.90, 2.20)*** |
Richest | 2.23 (2.03, 2.44)*** | 2.17 (1.98, 2.37)*** |
Marital Status | ||
Married/living with partner | Ref | Ref |
Never in union | 0.14 (0.13, 0.15)*** | 0.16 (0.15, 0.17)*** |
Widowed/divorced/separated | 0.57 (0.54, 0.61)*** | 0.63 (0.59, 0.67)*** |
Religion | ||
Christianity | Ref | |
Islamic | 0.88 (0.81, 0.95)** | |
Others | 0.47 (0.40, 0.56)*** | |
Visited by FP worker in the past 12 months | ||
No | Ref | |
Yes | 1.18 (1.08, 1.29)*** | |
Heard of FP in media in the past few months | ||
No | Ref | |
Yes | 1.26 (1.20, 1.32)*** | |
Covered by health insurance | ||
No | Ref | |
Yes | 1.09 (0.98, 1.21) |