Table 4 Heterogeneity in the impact of DV laws on women’s unmet need for family planning across different groups of women
Country | Unmet need treatment effectsa (95% CI) | Unmet need interaction effectsb (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
A: Location | ||
Rural (base) | − 6.7*** (− 10.3, − 3.1) | |
Urban | − 10.4*** (− 16.4, − 4.4) | − 3.7 (− 9.5, 1.9) |
B: Wealth | ||
Poorest (base) | − 4.5** (− 8.7, − 0.3) | |
Poor | − 5.2*** (− 8.8, − 1.5) | − 0.7 (− 3.1, 1.7) |
Middle | − 7.8*** (− 11.5, − 4.2) | − 3.3* (− 7.3, 0.6) |
Rich | − 9.5*** (− 13.8, − 5.3) | − 5.0** (− 10.1, − 0.0) |
Richest | − 11.4*** (− 17.5, − 5.3) | − 6.9** (− 13.1, − 0.7) |
C: Education | ||
No education (base) | − 3.4 (− 7.8, 1.1) | |
Primary | − 8.0*** (− 11.5, − 4.4) | − 4.6*** (− 7.5, − 1.7) |
Secondary | − 9.4*** (− 14.5, − 4.3) | − 6.0** (− 11.4, − 0.8) |
Higher | − 11.6*** (− 18.7, − 4.4) | − 8.2*** (− 13.8, − 2.6) |
D: Age | ||
15–19 (base) | − 2.8 (− 6.5, 0.9) | |
20–24 | − 9.5*** (− 13.8, − 5.4) | − 6.7*** (− 8.8, − 4.7) |
25–29 | − 8.7*** (− 12.4, − 5.1) | − 5.9*** (− 7.6, − 4.2) |
30–34 | − 7.6*** (− 11.3, − 3.9) | − 4.8*** (− 6.5, − 3.1) |
35–39 | − 5.6*** (− 9.2, − 2.2) | − 2.8*** (− 4.7, − 1.0) |
40–45 | − 11.2*** (− 18.7, − 3.7) | − 8.4** (− 14.8, − 2.0) |
E: Marriage after DV law | ||
Before (base) | − 7.4*** (− 10.7, − 4.1) | |
After | − 8.7*** (− 12.9, − 4.5) | − 1.3 (− 3.3, 0.6) |
F: Partner’s fertility preferencesc | ||
More (base) | − 6.1*** (− 10.4, − 1.8) | |
Same | − 9.5*** (− 13.8, − 5.3) | − 3.4 (− 7.7, 0.9) |
Fewer | − 8.5** (− 12.4, − 4.7) | − 2.4* (− 5.3, 0.4) |