Skip to main content

Attitude toward virginity and its determinants among girls in Tabriz: Iran

Abstract

Background

We aimed to assess the attitude of unmarried girls towards virginity, and its determinants, comparing three age cohorts (born in the 70s, 80s, and 90s) in the city of Tabriz in northwestern Iran.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 700 girls residing in Tabriz in 2021 employing a population-based cluster sampling based on health clinics and households. We collected data using a pilot-tested instrument, which comprised socio-demographic questions, and statements to assess attitudes towards virginity and its importance, the meaning of virginity, ways of losing virginity, and perception of the hymen. The data was analyzed using SPSS, version 21. Analysis of variance and independent t-test was used for bivariate analysis and linear regression was used to identify the determinants of the attitude. A p value under 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Only about one-third (35.2%) of unmarried girls considered preserving virginity as an important issue for girls before marriage in current days. About 27% were uncertain and about 38% believed it was unimportant. The importance of virginity (score range 7–35) was significantly greater for girls born in the 70s than for girls born in the 80s and 90s (p < 0.05). In the multivariate linear regression model, the determinants of the importance of virginity were older age, greater religious affiliation, living with both parents and lower consumption of the internet and social networks for sexual information.

Conclusions

This study indicates significant shifts in sexual attitudes among young females which may have important implications for marriage age and the culturally and age-appropriate sexual health interventions of young people.

Peer Review reports

Background

Virginity has its roots in medieval Western culture and refers to the ownership of a man over a woman [1]. For centuries, virginity as a “lack of sexual intercourse before marriage” has been considered a value and indication of purity and self-control in numerous religions [2]. One of the significant questions about virginity is whether women maintain their virginity due to individual attitudes and decisions or to conform to socio-cultural structures or moral obligations [3].

Virginity is a complex social concept [4, 5]. It has different definitions and varies across cultural contexts and societies [6, 7]. As in some modern developed societies, sexual activity among adolescents and youth is considered a norm. Changes in social and sexual norms in these societies have made premarital sex commonly practiced by most people [8] and apart from that, in these societies, virgin girls are not considered desirable sexual partners by many men [1, 9,10,11]. In contrast, in traditional societies, all aspects of life, including sex, depend on prearranged and conservative social rules. People in such societies may refuse to express their sexuality due to fear of these social controls and some lawsFootnote 1 [12]. In these traditional patriarchal societies, the issue of preserving a woman’s virginity is important, and the virginity of these women should only be lost through marriage [13]. Virginity is a symbol of decency for women and is respected as a virtue, and the related honour extends to the husband, family, and community in addition to women [14,15,16].

Regardless of the importance of virginity in many societies, attitudes toward sex and its moral aspects have changed dramatically in many parts of the world in recent decades [17, 18], leading to growing concerns about the consequences of such changes in conservative societies, and there is an inverse relationship between socio-cultural norms and liberal sexual attitudes [19].

Virginity in the socio-cultural context of Iran

Iran is a society with traditional and conservative sexual norms. Even though Iranian society has historical conservative and religious roots, research evidence has shown important social and attitudinal alterations in the younger generation over the past decades similar to sexual attitude changes in other societies [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Iranian society appears to be transitioning from traditional to modern values [27]. According to the conservative Iranian culture, premarital sexual relations are strictly forbidden [28] and any damage to a girl’s hymen before marriage would mean great catastrophe and can have severe consequences for the girl and her family [29].

Instead, the results of some recent studies in Iran reveal that some liberal sexual norms and behaviors have been developed among young people, and a significant minority of youth experience premarital sex, which often remains implicit [28, 30,31,32,33,34]. Some girls who had sex before marriage undergo hymen repair (Hymenoplasty) to introduce themselves as virgins. Girls who seek hymen repair, are concerned about social norms, while they have a liberal sexual attitude towards virginity [35,36,37]. In addition, evidence shows that a significant percentage of girls who have sex before marriage experience non-vaginal sexual contact to maintain their physical hymen. This sexual behavior has adverse health consequences because most girls do not protect themselves against sexually transmitted diseases and HIV in non-vaginal sex such as anal and oral sex. The most important concern of young people in sexual relationships is maintaining physical hymen and also preventing pregnancy, rather than a sexually transmitted disease or HIV [35, 38, 39].

The high proportion of the young population of Iran and the impact of international developments, especially in the era of communication and the modernization of social relations, have shaped a promising environment for the growing intergenerational gap. In Iran, between the first years after the Islamic Revolution (February 1979) and the end of the Iran-Iraq war (1980–1988), the issue of “heterosexual relationships” was less of a “social issue” due to people’s strong adherence to socio-cultural values and involvement in the war. However, in the 1990s, they gradually developed heterosexual relationships due to fundamental social changes and the emergence of a new young generation with different values and beliefs. The greatest divergence and intergenerational gap occur during a period of rapid socio-cultural change; hence the issue of intergenerational differences becomes especially prominent [40]. Therefore, in the context of socio-cultural developments in Iran over the recent decades, the study of attitudinal changes in age cohorts and different generations about the concept of virginity seems necessary to understand the sexual behaviors and sexual health of young groups and also its sexual health implications.

There is a kind of heterogeneity and inconsistency in understanding the concept of virginity in today’s Iranian society. Although the cultural and social values of this society highlight the preservation of virginity, a significant minority of young people including girls, experience premarital sex in Iran. It can be expected that the sexual and marital attitudes of young people, including girls, might have also changed [41, 42].

The social and cultural context of Tabriz in Iran

Tabriz is a city located in the Central District of Tabriz County, within the East Azerbaijan province of northwestern Iran. It ranks as the sixth most populous city in the country. The residents are bilingual, primarily speaking Azerbaijani as their first language and Persian as their second. Iranian Azerbaijanis are individuals of Azerbaijani ethnicity living in Iran, predominantly of Iranian descent. Additionally, they form a notable minority in Tehran. Tabriz is known as a religious city and adheres to traditional customs.

Despite the existence of the nature and traditional social and cultural values that govern this society, due to the location of this city in the border region and adjacent to the countries of Turkey and the Republic of Azerbaijan, new attitudes have been developed among the youth of Tabriz. The expansion of global communications, modernization, and the effectiveness of Turkish language satellite channels have been influential in creating such attitudinal changes [43]. From this point of view, Tabriz society, which is a combination of tradition and modernity, can be a suitable setting for research on the role of virginity in the formation of girls’ sexual behavior.

Since there are few studies on the concept of virginity in Iran and due to huge ethnic, cultural, and religious diversity in different parts of the country, a knowledge gap exists about the attitudes of young females towards virginity. Therefore, first, we aim to determine the attitudes of young girls in Tabriz towards virginity, secondly, to compare the attitude toward virginity among three generational cohorts (born in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s,) and finally to identify the determinants of attitudes toward virginity among unmarried girls in this specific context.

Methods

Study setting and participants

This study is a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional survey conducted among 700 Iranian girls living in Tabriz city in 2021. Inclusion criteria include Iranian nationality, Iranian Azarbaijani ethnicity, no history of previous marriage according to the socio-cultural definition in Iran, ability to read and write, girls born between the 1970s, and 1990s, and lack of physical and mental illnesses as self-report. Hence, exclusion criteria include not responding to all questions of the study instrument and unwillingness to continue completing the questionnaire. Since the experience of marriage might affect sexual attitudes, we have chosen only unmarried females to make the sample more homogeneous.

Sample and the data collection

According to the formula of sample size calculation for a proportion, the z value was assumed to be equal to 1.9 at a 95% confidence level and the p value based on the study of Honarvar et al. [30] in Iran and considering the d value was equal to 10% around p (proponents of premarital sexual relationships), the sample size was estimated as 459 girls. Due to the cluster sampling method, the design effect of 1.5 was considered in this study and the final sample size was increased to 700 unmarried girls.

After obtaining ethical approval from the ethics committee of the School of Nursing, Midwifery, and Rehabilitation of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (code: IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1400.021) and approving the code of ethics in the ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, permission was obtained for sampling in health centers in Tabriz. The research setting in the current study was health centers in Tabriz. An online method was used to collect data and an online questionnaire was designed using Porsline (https://porsline.ir). The questionnaire was provided to the participants through WhatsApp, Instagram, and Telegram social networks. The sampling method comprised cluster sampling and proportional probability to size. Inhabitants in Tabriz city tend to be more influenced by modern ideas and social developments than small towns and villages. The population of 1,559,000 people in Tabriz (according to the 2016 statistics) was distributed in ten urban areas. First, the list of 83 health centers in the ten districts of Tabriz was determined, and 18 health centers were randomly selected from them. The determined sample size was divided among the selected health centers based on quotas. Households that had at least a single daughter with inclusion criteria through the SIB system (The integrated health system (IHS) entitled “SIB” was launched in 2016 as an electronic health record (EHR) system in the country) [44]. The SIB system in the city of Tabriz covers more than 90–92% of the population living in this city, which is a desirable amount of coverage, and the details of Iranian families with all its members are available in the SIB system in health centers. Hence, we could approach these people, in the mentioned randomly selected centers. In the first step, telephone calls were made to these people; if the participants were single, born in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, invited to participate in the study. If they agreed, their verbal consent was sought and recorded. If the participants were willing and satisfied, an anonymous mobile number was obtained from them, and a questionnaire link was sent to them to fill out at home in a stress-free and confidential manner.

The data was collected from September 2021 until March 2022 (6 months). It should be noted that the cohorts of the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s were compared as the second concern of this study. Therefore, we mean the 1970s (born 1971.3.21 to 1981.3.20), the 80s (born 1981.3.21 to 1991.3.20), and the 90s (born 1991.3.21 to 2001.3.20). Since the calendar date in Iran is Solar Hijri, the date of birth of the participants in the study is based on the beginning of the solar, and by converting the solar year to the Gregorian, the dates are not from the start of the Gregorian year.

The study instrument

The data collection instrument was a constructed questionnaire. The research team did not find an existing instrument with appropriate socio-cultural adaptation to the concept of virginity by reviewing existing literature. Hence, a constructed questionnaire was developed using related literature and tools in some other studies [5, 7, 9, 12, 25, 45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58]. The instrument comprised of three main sections:

The first section comprised 16 questions and some questions about individual and social characteristics including age, education, occupation, parents’ employment, place of birth, ethnicity, economic status, communication with parents, current life situation, self, and parents’ endorsement to religious issues, and consumption of the Internet and social media to obtain sexual information.

The second section comprised some items and statements to assess the attitudes of girls about the importance of virginity. Which includes statements such as: “Girls should not have any sexual intercourse until marriage”, “I maintain my virginity due to adherence to cultural values”, “I maintain my virginity due to adherence to moral values” and “Love is not a good reason for losing virginity”. This section was based on a 5-point Likert scale (completely agree, agree, no opinion, disagree, completely disagree). The attitude scale comprised seven statements. The mean score of girls’ attitudes had a range of 7–35, and the higher mean score indicated greater agreement with virginity and vice versa.

The third section comprised of statements about the meaning of virginity from the girls’ perspective (4 items), which includes the items “not having any kind of sexual contact with the opposite sex means virginity”, “having a healthy hymen means virginity” and “not having any sexual intercourse (in the form of penetration) means virginity”, the perception of losing virginity and its circumstances (5 items) which includes the items through vaginal intercourse, anal intercourse, oral sex, touching the genitals and kissing and hugging, and finally the impression that hearing the hymen creates in the girl’s mind (8 items) which includes the items “thin layer in the girl’s vagina that ruptures in the first vaginal intercourse”, “is a symbol and manifestation of purity in girls”, “organ which is used to prove the virginity of girls” and “it is associated with pain”. This section included 17 statements. All negative statements were scored in reverse.

The validity and reliability of the survey instrument were assessed before the data collection. Face, content, and construct validity were conducted to evaluate the survey tool. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used to confirm face validity. In qualitative face validity, the items were examined in terms of difficulty, appropriateness, and ambiguity, and quantitative face validity, the effect score of the questions was more than 1.5, and these items were considered suitable for further analysis.

In addition, both qualitative and quantitative methods were used to evaluate the content validity. To determine the validity of qualitative content, the opinions of ten scholars with relevant experience and specialty in sexual and reproductive health were sought. Two indices of content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI) were used for quantitative content validity. CVR for an individual attitude of girls was 0.76, and CVI was 0.96.

The construct validity of girls’ attitude scales was evaluated using factor analysis. Based on the results of factor analysis, one of the items was excluded from factor 1 (statement 7: Having sex with a boyfriend and losing the hymen does not lead to marriage) and to assess the reliability of the questionnaire, the internal correlation method using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was utilized. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for individual perspectives with seven questions was 0.897. Hence, the scale of girls’ attitudes on the importance of virginity was finalized with seven items of statements (score range: 7–35). We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the survey instrument to ensure the respondents understood the questionnaire statements and identified potential barriers to implementing the fieldwork.

Data analysis

Data cleaning was performed, and analysis was carried out using SPSS software, version 21. The normality of quantitative data was assessed using Kurtosis and Skewness, all of which had normal distributions. Descriptive statistics including frequency (percentage), mean and standard deviation are used to report demographic-social characteristics and examine girls’ attitudes. One-way analysis of variance and an independent t-test in the two-way analysis was used to investigate the relationship between socio-demographic status and girls’ attitudes. Then, their Pearson correlation coefficients were measured for the variables significantly related to attitude (p < 0.05). Because most variables with a significant relationship with girls’ attitudes were highly correlated, multivariate linear regression analysis was done in two different models using the enter method to identify the determinants of girls’ attitudes after controlling the effect of other factors. The results of multivariate linear regression were reported as regression coefficient (B) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. It should be mentioned that none of the VIFs in the studied variables in the multivariate linear regression model was higher than 10, so there was no problem in terms of high collinearity.

Results

The mean age of girls was 26.6 (SD = 6.3) years. More than half of them (56.9%) had postgraduate and bachelor’s degrees, and 46.4% were employed. More than half of the girls (58.3%) reported an average family economic situation. The majority (about 79%) lived with their parents. More than half of the girls (59.1%) practiced Islamic acts of worship every day or sometimes. More than one-third (37.6%) of girls sometimes and almost one-third of them (34.3%) often or always used the Internet and social networks to obtain sexual information. About 34% of girls reported that their fathers had an undergraduate degree and 43% reported a mother with an undergraduate degree. More than half of the girls (54.0%) considered their parents somewhat religious. Evaluating the relationship between girls and their parents showed that communication with mothers was better than with fathers; approximately 79% of girls had a good relationship with their mothers, while only 63% reported a good relationship with their fathers (Table 1).

Table 1 Relationship between demographic, socioeconomic, and family characteristics of girls with their attitudes toward virginity (n = 700)

The description of girls’ sexual attitudes showed that nearly half of the girls (44.8%) agreed that girls should not have any sexual intercourse until marriage, while only 34% were opposed or completely opposed to abstaining from premarital sex. Only about one-third (35.2%) of girls agreed that it is important to maintain the virginity of girls before marriage in today’s world.

Motivation to preserve virginity was 58.5% due to adherence to cultural values, 73.4% due to adherence to moral values, and nearly 45% due to their religious adherence. More than half of the participants (54.0%) believed that love is not a good reason for losing virginity (Table 2).

Table 2 Individual attitudes of girls about the importance of virginity (n = 700)

In response to the question “What is the meaning of virginity from the perspective of girls?” About 34% reported that virginity means not having the experience of vaginal penetrative intercourse. In response to the question, “How do you think a girl loses her virginity?” The majority of girls reported it as through vaginal intercourse (96.4%). In response to the question “What does hearing the phrase “hymen” create in your mind?”. Girls chose the following options: “thin layer in the girl’s vagina that ruptures in the first vaginal intercourse” (61.1%), “only a small part of a girl’s external genitalia” (28.3%), and “organ which is used to prove the virginity of girls” (19.9%) and “it is a symbol and manifestation of purity in girls” (18.4%) (Table 3).

Table 3 Girls’ attitudes on the meaning of virginity, how to lose virginity and the idea of virginity (n = 700)

The mean score of girls’ attitudes towards virginity and its importance was 22.9 (SD: ±7.2) (score range 7–35). Comparison of the mean score of girls’ attitudes among different age groups reveals that the mean score of the girl’s attitudes towards virginity who were born in the seventies was 25.2 (SD: 6.9), eighties was 22.1 (SD: 7.8). Nineties was 22.8 (SD: 7.1). There was a borderline statistically significant difference between the mean score of attitudes among different age groups (p = 0.049). Therefore, we can suggest that girls born in the 70s are more conservative towards virginity than girls born in the 80s and 90s (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of the mean score of girls’ attitudes among different age cohorts

Bivariate analysis showed some significant relationships between selected socio-demographic and family factors with attitudes toward virginity. These factors comprised of: age (p = 0.049), education (p = 0.001), occupations (p = 0.008), adherence to religion (p = 0.001), the current status of girls’ lives (p = 0.001), consumption of Internet and social networks for obtaining sexual information (p = 0.001), father’s education (p = 0.001) and mother’s education (p = 0.001), father’s employment (p = 0.009) and mother’s employment(p = 0.021), relationship with mother (p = 0.001) and relationship with father (p = 0.010) and religiosity of parents (p = 0.001). The greatest mean score of attitude about the importance of virginity was among girls with a diploma and lower education (24.9), those who were housewives (25.3), girls who performed daily or occasional religious acts (25.5), girls who lived with their both parents (23.5), girls who never/rarely used the Internet and social networks to obtain sexual information (24/8). Girls who had a father with an undergraduate education (24.5) and who had a mother with an undergraduate education (24.3); girls whose father’s job was a worker or unemployed (25.6) and girls whose mother’s job was a housewife (23.2), girls who had a good relationship with their mother (23.4) and father (23.5) and finally girls who considered their parents very much religious (25.4) (Table 1).

Because many of these factors are correlated, Pearson correlation coefficients were estimated between selected demographic and social characteristics of girls. According to the correlation matrix, age strongly and significantly correlates with girls’ education (0.387, p < 0.001) and occupation (0.388, p < 0.001). Moreover, there was an important and direct relationship between parents’ education (0.684, p < 0.001), parents’ job (0.081, p < 0.001), communication with father and father’s education (0.083, p < 0.001), communication with mother and mother’s education (0.28, p < 0.001), and parents’ religion and the girls’ endorsement to religion (0.417, p < 0.001) (Table 4).

Table 4 Pearson correlation coefficients between demographic and social characteristics

According to the Pearson Correlation Coefficients, some factors with lower correlation were selected for the multivariate linear regression analysis. Two linear models were performed using the enter method to identify the determinants of girls’ attitudes toward virginity after controlling the effect of other factors. The results of model 1 revealed that the variables of age, religious affiliation, current life status, use of the Internet, and social networks for obtaining sexual information were among the predictors of girls’ attitudes towards virginity. In a way, the mean score of girls’ attitude towards the importance of virginity among unmarried girls aged 41–50 years was 1.3 points greater (B = 1.3; 95% Cl: 0.1–2.6, p = 0.043) than girls aged 31–40 years. The mean score of attitude towards virginity among girls who performed religious practice daily or occasionally was 7.7 greater (B = 7.7; 95% Cl: 6.4–9.0, p = 0.001), and this score was 4.9 greater among girls who did not do religious practice of worship (B = 4.9; 95% Cl: 3.9–6.0, p = 0.001) compared to girls who had no religious beliefs.

The mean score of individual attitude towards virginity among girls who lived with both parents was 3.7 greater (B = 3.7; 95% Cl: 2.2–5.3 p = 0.001), and girls who lived with one parent were 2.9 greater (B = 2.9; 95% Cl: 0.8–5.0, p = 0.006) than girls who lived independent of their parents. The mean score of a person’s attitude toward virginity among girls who never/rarely consumed the Internet and social media for sexual information was 2.7 greater (B = 2.7; 95% Cl: 1.5–3.9, p = 0.001) than girls who used it often/always, and this score was 1.6 greater (B = 1.6; 95% Cl: 0.5–2.7, p = 0.005) among girls who used them occasionally than in the girls who used them often/always.

In the second model, girls’ education was also added to other factors. In this model, girls’ education and their mothers’ education were factors determining girls’ attitudes towards virginity as well. The mean score of attitude towards virginity was 3 scores greater (B = 3.0; 95% Cl: 1.5–4.6, p = 0.001) among girls with a diploma and lower education and also 1.4 greater (B = 1.4; 95% Cl: 0.2–2.5, p = 0.020) among girls with postgraduate and bachelor’s degrees than girls with master’s and doctoral degrees. The mean score of personal attitude towards virginity among girls whose mother’s education was below diploma was 2.1 scores greater (B = 2.1; 95% Cl: 0.6–3.5, p = 0.005) than girls who had mothers with university education (Table 5).

Table 5 Determinants of girls’ individual attitudes about the importance of virginity based on multivariate linear regression model (n = 700)

Discussion

The results of the study revealed that although about half of the girls (44.8%) agreed that girls should not have any sexual intercourse until marriage, only about one-third (35.2%) of girls were in favour that in today’s world, it is important to maintain the virginity before marriage. About one-third of the young population has liberal sexual attitudes about virginity, while their understanding of the moral and cultural values and possibly social norms of marriage prevents them from losing their physical hymen or virginity. People who have sex in a non-vaginal relationship or resort to virginity repair indicate the dominance of social norms over individual attitudes. These results are in line with sexual script theory, which is a framework that explores how cultural norms and social influences shape sexual behaviour, suggesting that such behaviour is not just biologically driven. Individuals develop cognitive scripts through socialization that guide their sexual thoughts and actions, influenced by societal norms and media [59].

Another important finding is that in Tabriz society with religious, traditional, and historical context, there is an important gap between girls’ attitudes and their understanding of the normative importance of virginity for marriage. This is consistent with a previous comprehensive study about the premarital sexuality of female college students in Tehran, which showed attitudes were considerably more tolerant of premarital sex than norms. These findings suggest that traditional norms on heterosexual intimacy are eroding among young people [60].

The personal attitudes of unmarried females towards virginity and its importance shown in this study are consistent with the previous literature about liberal sexual attitudes toward premarital sex among the young generation. A qualitative study (2019) indicated that the most significant considerations for premarital sex among female college students in Tehran are the importance and motivation of marriage, norms, values, family expectations, gender and social norms [57]. This means that the gap between an individual’s belief in virginity and an understanding of the social norms associated with virginity may lead to other sexual experiences that do not harm physical hymen. Particularly the importance of girls’ virginity for boys and their families at the time of marriage is another issue that can play an important role in the sexual behaviour of unmarried women. A study in Kerman, one of Iran’s eastern cities, found that in the culture of Iranian society, people believe in blood-stained sheets as an indicator of virginity, half of the grooms who did not experience the bride’s bleeding during their first sexual intercourse at marriage had a violent reaction and expected to see bloody sheets as a traditional indicator of virginity, the traditional culture of the community influences young men’s behaviour [61]. In another study, physical virginity was the only red line for Iranian girls in Iran. Girls who wanted to have sex considered that they had the right to have sex, but their hymen needed to have remained intact [34].

Another important finding of this study was the development of a greater liberal attitude towards virginity among younger girls (born in the 80s and 90s) than girls born in the 70s. It seems that sexual values change over time under the influence of various factors. Traditional values of marriage and premarital sex seem to be in a transition into some liberal attitudes among younger generations. This finding is consistent with the results of another study in Tehran (2016), which showed that young people had a more liberal sexual attitude, which could reflect a socio-cultural transition in the sexual attitudes of different age groups of participants [42]. According to sexual script theory, sexual scripts including those related to virginity, are not fixed or universal, they are subject to change and transformation [62, 63].

However, during life course, people might reassess their attitude to life situations and experiences, and some young girls may change their sexual attitude as they get older. In the absence of marriage opportunities, they may reconsider their view of virginity and premarital relationships. Conversely, in the case of premarital sexual experience, adopt a different view of these relationships, and their experience will lead to a change in their sexual attitudes. People’s attitudes toward relationships do not remain constant throughout life and change over time. More qualitative and longitudinal studies can highlight these changes in sexual attitudes over time.

Factors such as age, religiosity, living with both parents, and less consumption of the Internet and social networks to obtain sexual information predict girls’ conservative attitudes toward virginity. As a result, virginity was more important for girls in higher age groups, with more religious adherence and living with both parents, than younger girls, with less religious adherence and living independently from parents. Likewise, the prominence of virginity in girls who had less access to social networks was significantly higher than in girls who had more access to social networks. The development of liberal sexual attitudes and values is shown to be associated with access to global media in a way that youth might choose new role models in sexuality. Access to sexually explicit materials on the Internet has also become much easier for young people and this might be responsible for greater liberal sexual norms and attitudes and greater involvement in premarital sex [64, 65].

Since more than 50% of the participants in the present study did not consider religion as a factor in maintaining their virginity, adherence to morality (73.4%) and culture (58.5%) were more important rationales for preserving virginity than religious values. Consequently, it is supposed that the development of liberal sexual attitudes among a portion of the young generation can reduce the importance of virginity and lead to premarital sexual behaviors among the younger generation.

One of the metaphors used by the adolescents in a study about virginity was “virginity as a myth” [66]. Moreover, the most important reason for virginity in a study in the United States was reported to be because of personal beliefs (e.g., believing that premarital sex is wrong), fear (e.g., fear of unwanted pregnancy, and sexually transmitted diseases and HIV), inadequacy (e.g., feeling undesirable), lack of love, lack of desire for sex and reluctant sexual partner [9]. In contrast to the study in the United States, the results of the current study relate the importance of virginity more to the moral and socio-cultural values that govern these societies than to personal values and reasons.

In Iran, preserving intact hymen is one of the most significant concerns for girls and even boys in premarital sex and affects sexual intercourse [57]. In this study, most girls (96.4%) believed that girls’ virginity is lost through vaginal sexual intercourse, and in fact, virginity is defined by an intact hymen and lack of vaginal intercourse. Although preserving an intact hymen can be a restraining factor for practicing sexual contact among a significant proportion of single girls, some girls might practice non-vaginal unprotected sex and they are exposed to greater sexual risks and are more vulnerable [34]. A survey among university students in Turkey, with similar cultural beliefs about virginity, revealed that sexually experienced females reported greater oral and anal sex compared to vaginal intercourse (67).

In societies where virginity is still normatively and socially important, the occurrence of unprotected non-vaginal intercourse can increase the risk of sexually transmitted diseases, and HIV among young people, which needs to be addressed in sexual health programs and interventions. Moreover, young people need to be informed of the psychological, physical, and social consequences and harms of these high-risk relationships. Future studies are recommended to examine girls’ and boys’ beliefs about the psychological, social, and health consequences of non-vaginal sexual behaviours.

Strengths and limitations

One of the limitations of this study was the lack of coverage of 8–10% of the population of Tabriz by the SIB system who have not been referred to the health clinics in the city and have not been registered. Consequently, via the stratified cluster sampling method, we compensated for this limitation. This study also only reflects the views of unmarried girls towards virginity and the perspective and attitudes of men and young men have not been considered in this study and gender differences were not assessed. The authors suggest future similar studies among young men as well. Likewise, regarding the sensitivity of the research topic, it was probable that the participants did not express the truth; despite that the researcher tried to explain the importance of the research topic and the accuracy of their responses, establish communication, and make friendly interactions with participants and observe ethical principles to gain participants’ trust and confidence and overcome this limitation. Finally, this was a cross-sectional survey, hence, causality cannot be established with certainty, and these need to be considered when interpreting these findings.

Conclusion

According to these results, changes in sexual attitudes among young people might have important implications in marriage dynamics, including age at marriage in Iran, and also the sexual and reproductive health of young adults. Due to religious, cultural, societal, and legal expectations of preserving virginity particularly for women, and due to many socioeconomic barriers to marriage, the development of such liberal sexual attitudes will be associated with greater heterosexual intimacy and sex among youth before marriage. Premarital sexuality will have important adverse consequences for young people due to the lack of sexual health programs for unmarried people in the context of Iran. Involvement in such relationships can lead to risky sexual behaviors, including unprotected non-vaginal sex, delayed marriage, engagement with multiple high-risk partners, and increased susceptibility to STIs, HIV, unplanned pregnancies, and abortions. Health policymakers must recognize these shifts in sexual attitudes and implement comprehensive, culturally appropriate educational programs. Such initiatives are crucial for protecting unmarried young adults from engaging in risky sexual behaviors.

Availability of data and materials

Datasets used and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. According to Article 221 of Iran’s Islamic Penal Code, if an unmarried boy or girl commits sexual intercourse secretly and without intimacy, they are considered guilty, and this sexual intercourse constitutes adultery and is subject to punishment. However, the circumstances for proving is fairly difficult.

Abbreviations

CVR:

Content validity ratio

CVI:

Content validity index

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Landor AM, Simons LG. Why virginity pledges succeed or fail: the moderating effect of religious commitment versus religious participation. J Child Fam Stud. 2014;23(6):1102–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Olson RM, García-Moreno C. Virginity testing: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ababio P, Salifu YJ. “When you talk about virginity, it’s about females”: views on virginity Among University of Ghana students. Sex Cult. 2017;21(2):549–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Erickson PI, Badiane L, Singer M. The social context and meaning of virginity loss among African American and Puerto Rican young adults in Hartford. Med Anthropol Q. 2013;27(3):313–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carpenter LM. Gender and the meaning and experience of virginity loss in the contemporary United States. Gend Soc. 2002;16(3):345–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cha ES, Doswell WM, Kim KH, Charron-Prochownik D, Patrick TE. Evaluating the theory of planned behavior to explain intention to engage in premarital sex amongst Korean college students: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(7):1147–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barnett MD, Moore JM. The construct validity of the first coital affective reaction scale and virginity beliefs scale. Personality Individ Differ. 2017;109:102–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Halpern CT, Haydon AA. Sexual timetables for oral-genital, vaginal, and anal intercourse: sociodemographic comparisons in a nationally representative sample of adolescents. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(6):1221–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sprecher S, Treger S. Virgin college students’ reasons for and reactions to their abstinence from sex: results from a 23-year study at a Midwestern US university. J Sex Res. 2015;52(8):936–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gesselman AN, Webster GD, Garcia JR. Has virginity lost its virtue? Relationship stigma associated with being a sexually inexperienced adult. J Sex Res. 2017;54(2):202–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Landor AM, Simons LG. Correlates and predictors of virginity among heterosexual African American young adults. Sex Cult. 2019;23(3):943–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yaşan A, Essizoglu A, Yildirim EA. Predictor factors associated with premarital sexual behaviors among university students in an Islamic culture. Int J Sex Health. 2009;21(3):145–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cinthio H. “You go home and tell that to my dad!” conflicting claims and understandings on hymen and virginity. Sex Cult. 2015;19(1):172–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Benbrahim Z, Mekkaoui AE, Lahmidani N, Mellas N, Ismali Z. Gastric cancer: an epidemiological overview. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale). 2017;7(2):304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mulumeoderhwa M. Virginity requirement versus sexually active young people: what girls and boys think about virginity in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo. Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47(3):565–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chisale SS, Moyo H. Church discipline as virginity testing: shaping adolescent girls’ sexuality in the evangelical Lutheran churches in Africa. Altern J. 2016;23(2):89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith TW, Son J. Trends in public attitudes about sexual morality. Chicago: NORC at the University of Chicago; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Twenge JM, Sherman RA, Wells BE. Changes in American adults’ sexual behavior and attitudes, 1972–2012. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(8):2273–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Earle JR, Perricone PJ, Davidson JK, Moore NB, Harris CT, Cotten SR. Premarital sexual attitudes and behavior at a religiously-affiliated university: two decades of change. Sex Cult. 2007;11(2):39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ayu SM, Sofiana L, Wibowo M, Gustina E, Setiawan A. Predisposing, enabling and reinforcing factors of premarital sex behavior in school adolescents. KEMAS. 2019;15(1):29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nhan NTT, Phu PT, Tra PTT, Phuong PTA, Nhu NQ, Thu NT. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of premarital sex among bedsit-living students in Hue City, Vietnam. J Public Health Epidemiol. 2019;11(4):84–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dinh T-H, van Teijlingen E. Factors influencing engagement in premarital sex among Vietnamese young adults: a qualitative study. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2021;33(4):20180201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Majumdar C. Attitudes towards premarital sex in India: traditionalism and cultural change. Sex Cult. 2018;22(2):614–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Manalastas EJ, David CC. Valuation of women’s virginity in the Philippines. Asian Women. 2018;34(1):23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Teo HSY, Simon A. The perception of premarital sex among students in a religious moral-based university. Abstr Proc Int Sch Conf. 2019;7(1):1558–85.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Awwad J, Nassar A, Usta I, Shaya M, Younes Z, Ghazeeri G. Attitudes of Lebanese university students towards surgical hymen reconstruction. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(8):1627–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rafizadeh M. Sexual politics in modern Iran. Gend Manag Int J. 2011;26(6):451–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghorashi Z. Teenage sexting and sexual behaviors in an Iranian setting. Sex Cult. 2019;23(4):1274–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Robatjazi M, Simbar M, Nahidi F, Gharehdaghi J, Emamhadi M, Vedadhir A-A, et al. Virginity testing beyond a medical examination. Global J Health Sci. 2016;8(7):152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Honarvar B, Salehi F, Barfi R, Asadi Z, Honarvar H, Odoomi N, et al. Attitudes toward and experience of singles with premarital sex: a population-based study in Shiraz, Southern Iran. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(2):395–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zahedi R, Nasiri N, Zeinali M, Noroozi A, Hajebi A, Haghdoost A-A, et al. The prevalence and associated factors of extra/pre-marital sexual behaviors among university students in Kerman, Iran. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2019;8(1): e88266.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mahmoodi M, Mirzaee M, Jahani Y, McFarland W, Sharifi H. Age and factors associated with first non-marital sex among Iranian youth. Sex Cult. 2020;24(3):532–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Khalajabadi Farahani F, Cleland J. Perceived norms of premarital heterosexual relationships and sexuality among female college students in Tehran. Cult Health Sex. 2015;17(6):700–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rahmani A, Merghati-Khoei E, Moghaddam-Banaem L, Hajizadeh E, Montazeri A. The viewpoints of sexually active single women about premarital sexual relationships: a qualitative study in the Iranian context. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2016;5(1): e23159.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ahmadi A. Recreating virginity in Iran: hymenoplasty as a form of resistance. Med Anthropol Q. 2016;30(2):222–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaivanara M. Virginity dilemma: re-creating virginity through hymenoplasty in Iran. Cult Health Sex. 2016;18(1):71–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ahmadi A. Ethical issues in hymenoplasty: views from Tehran’s physicians. J Med Ethics. 2014;40(6):429–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Farahani FK, Akhondi MM, Shirzad M, Azin A. HIV/STI risk-taking sexual Behaviours and risk perception among Male University students in Tehran: implications for HIV prevention among youth. J Biosoc Sci. 2018;50(1):86–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Robatjazi M, Simbar M, Nahidi F, Gharedaghi J, Vedadhir A, Emamhadi MA, et al. Survey the concepts of virginity & its pathology. Sci J Forensic Med. 2017;23(1):25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Azad Armaki T, Saei MS. Sociological explanation of anomic sexual relationships in Iran. J Fam Res. 2012;74:28.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Noroozi M, Effat-Al-Sadat Merghati Khoei F, Taleghani MT, Gholami A. How does a group of Iranian youth conceptualize their risky sexual experiences? Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17(2): e18301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Motamedi M, Merghati-Khoei E, Shahbazi M, Rahimi-Naghani S, Salehi M, Karimi M, et al. Paradoxical attitudes toward premarital dating and sexual encounters in Tehran, Iran: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. 2016;13(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Adlipour MT, Afshar SA, Sohrabi A. Turk-speaking satellite networks and the ethnic identity of the youth in the city of Tabriz. Soc Sci Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad. 2016;13(1):7–49.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Khammarnia M, Setoodehzadeh F, Peyvand M, Setayesh AH, Rezaei K, KordTamini A, et al. Evaluation of integrated health system technology acceptance among the users of Health Centers of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences: Iran. Evid Based Health Policy Manag Econ. 2019;3(3):154–61.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Carpenter L. Virginity lost: an intimate portrait of first sexual experiences. New York: NYU Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Eriksson J, Humphreys T. Virginity beliefs scale. In: Handbook of sexuality-related measures. New York: Routledge; 2011. p. 638–9.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Uecker JE, Angotti N, Regnerus MD. Going most of the way: “technical virginity” among American adolescents. Soc Sci Res. 2008;37(4):1200–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wilson KL, Smith ML, Menn M. Abstinence-related word associations and definitions of abstinence and virginity among Missouri High School Freshmen. J Sch Health. 2013;83(11):787–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Awwad J, Nassar A, Usta I, Shaya M, Younes Z, Ghazeeri G. Attitudes of Lebanese university students towards surgical hymen reconstruction. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42:1627–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Landor AM, Simons LG. Correlates and predictors of virginity among heterosexual African American young adults. Sex Cult. 2019;23:943–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lipman CM, Moore AJ. Virginity and guilt differences between men and women. Butl J Undergrad Res. 2016;2(1):25.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Shirazi KK, Morowatisharifabad MA. Religiosity and determinants of safe sex in Iranian non-medical male students. J Relig Health. 2009;48:29–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hojat M, Shariat SV, Ansari S. Iranian college students’ attitudes toward premarital sex, marriage, and family before and after the Islamic Revolution. Int J Sex Health. 2015;27(3):224–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Motamedi M, Merghati-Khoei E, Shahbazi M, Rahimi-Naghani S, Salehi M, Karimi M, et al. Paradoxical attitudes toward premarital dating and sexual encounters in Tehran, Iran: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. 2016;13:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Molla M, Berhane Y, Lindtjørn B. Traditional values of virginity and sexual behavior in rural Ethiopian youth: results from a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Arega WL, Zewale TA, Bogale KA. Premarital sexual practice and associated factors among high school youths in Debretabor town, South Gondar zone, North West Ethiopia, 2017. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Khalajabadi-Farahani F, Månsson S-A, Cleland J. Engage in or refrain from? A qualitative exploration of premarital sexual relations among female college students in Tehran. J Sex Res. 2019;56(8):1009–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rahmani A, Mezel JA, Allahqoli L, Fallahi A, Sadeghi N, Higgs P. Risky sexual behavior assessment scale for young women: development and psychometric assessment. Gend Sex Asia Pac. 2019;43:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wiederman MW. The gendered nature of sexual scripts. Fam J. 2005;13(4):496–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Farahani FKA. Norms, attitude, and sexual conduct among female college students in Tehran: implications for reproductive health policy and research in Iran. PhD thesis, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. 2008.

  61. Niki Rashidi F, Ghorashi Z, Esmaeilzadeh S. How do some Iranian grooms react if there is not any sign of blood stained bed sheets? Sex Cult. 2020;24(6):2056–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Jones SL, Hostler HR. Sexual script theory: an integrative exploration of the possibilities and limits of sexual self-definition. J Psychol Theol. 2002;30(2):120–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Machette AT, Montgomery-Vestecka G. Applying sexual scripts theory to sexual communication discrepancies. Commun Rep. 2023;36(2):123–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Farahani FK. Exposure to sexual explicit materials (pornography) in internet & cyber space and its influences on sexual behavior and interpersonal relationships among adolescents in Tehran. J Fam Res. 2019;15(1):127–53.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Taleghani F, Khoie ESM, Noroozi M, Tavakoli M, Gholami A. The role of mass media in Iranian youth’s premarital sexual relationships: a qualitative study. Int J Commut Based Nurs Midwifery. 2017;5(1):91.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Mehrolhassani MH, Yazdi-Feyzabadi V, Mirzaei S, Zolala F, Haghdoost A-A, Oroomiei N. The concept of virginity from the perspective of Iranian adolescents: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Nazik F, Sönmez MO, Akben M. Gender, sexual experiences and sexual behavioral differences in Turkish university students. J Biosoc Sci. 2021;53(3):471–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We highly appreciate the endeavors made by the head, authorities, and personnel of in the health centers in the city of Tabriz as well as the girls participated in this study.

Funding

This Study was funded by the Tehran University of Medical Sciences (grant number IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1400.021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SSN, RM, FKF, and MM were involved in the conception and design, acquisition of data, and drafting of the manuscript. FKF(corresponding author) and SN were involved in the conception and design, acquisition of data, blinded analysis of the data, interpretation of data, and writing this manuscript. All authors gave their final approval of this version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farideh Khalajabadi-Farahani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All the procedures performed in this study were in full compliance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethical approval was obtained from the organizational ethics committee of the School of Nursing, Midwifery, and Rehabilitation of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1400.021) to conduct the research. Written informed consent was submitted by all the participants before enrolment in the study. The study protocol was performed according to the relevant guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naghizadeh, S., Maasoumi, R., Mirghafourvand, M. et al. Attitude toward virginity and its determinants among girls in Tabriz: Iran. Reprod Health 21, 149 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12978-024-01884-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12978-024-01884-0

Keywords