From: Epidemiology, etiology and treatment of female vaginal injury
Author and year of publication | Laboratory animal | Site and degree of vaginal injuries | Type of biological materials | Size and placement of biological materials | Therapeutic effect |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xiao et al, in 2023 [134] | Pig | 4 cm thickness vaginal apical defects | DBM from pig bladder | 4 cm; Placed in the external cervical orifice and the vaginal stump | 1.Integrated well with the vagina, achieve the regeneration of vaginal epithelial layers and muscularis. 2.Reconstruct the vaginal anatomy and restore the vaginal function. |
Hympánová et al, in 2020 [135] | Sheep | 3 cm longitudinal incision in the posterior vaginal wall | 1.Ultra-lightweight PP non-degradable textile mesh 2.Electrospun implants (UPy-PC and PU mesh) | 3.5 × 3.5 cm; Placed in between vaginal epithelial layer and rectal serosa | 1.These three meshes were well adapted for the vagina. 2.Electrospun implants had milder inflammatory response. |
Ye et al, in 2020 [136] | Rat | Radiation-induced vaginal injury | 3D protein scaffolds with ADSCs | Placed in the site of vaginal injury | A better therapeutic effect on the VS and contracture than simple ADSCs treatment. |
Wang et al, in 2019 [93] | Rat | Bilateral oophorectomy | 1.ADSCs of rat were treated with recombinant hCTGF 2.ADSCs-seeded APP and ADSCs-seeded ABP | Placed in the vaginal mucosa, and the serosal surface was placed dorsally. | 1.hCTGF promoted the expression of collagen I and III and induced ADSCs differentiation. 2. ADSCs -seeded APP and ABP reduced inflammation and improved the biocompatibility in vivo. |
Zhang et al, in 2018 [54] | Rat | Vaginal mucosa was stripped | bone marrow MSCs-seeded SIS | Placed in the cervix and vaginal orifice (vaginal reconstruction) | 1.The neovagina with SIS+MSCs had more smooth muscle, nerve tissue and angiogenesis than that with SIS only. 2.MSCs promoted neovagina recovery. |
Chang et al, in 2017 [137] | Rat | An incision in posterior vaginal wall | Knitted silk fibroin scaffold | 1 cm × 0.5 cm; Placed in between vaginal fibromuscular layer and epithelial layer | Good biocompatibility; No severe inflammation; No mesh exposure complication. |
Liang et al, in 2017 [138] | Rhesus macaque | Hysterectomy, uterosacral ligaments and paravaginal attachments transection | ECM bioscaffold from urinary bladder matrix | Placed in between the level of uterosacral ligaments (level I support) and paravaginal attachments (level II support), sutured to vagina. | 1.Enhance the level I and level II support of vagina. 2.Impair vaginal integrity in a short time. |
Zhang et al, in 2017 [139] | Rat | Hysterectomy and proximal vagina was removed by 1 cm | 1.AVM from porcine vagina 2. SIS from porcine intestine | Placed in between vaginal stump and retroperitoneal fascia | Compared with SIS, vaginal reconstruction with AVM were closer to normal vagina, and had nice biocompatibility and biomechanical properties. |
Fan et al, in 2014 [140] | Rabbit | A 2 cm transverse incision in the posterior wall of vagina | 1.PP mesh 2.Porcine-derived cUBM | 2 cm × 1 cm; Placed in between the fibromuscular layer and epithelium of vagina | 1.Compared with cUBM, vaginal PP mesh had greater strength, and erosion. 2. Vaginal cUBM had milder inflammation response, better biocompatibility than PP mesh, and stable mechanical qualities. |