Skip to main content

Epidemiology, etiology and treatment of female vaginal injury

Abstract

The preservation of vaginal anatomical structure and physiological function is critical for women’s health and should not be ignored. Vaginal injuries have a negative impact on women’s quality of life. Vaginal delivery is the most common cause of vaginal injuries, 53-79% of women suffer from perineal and vaginal lacerations during labor. The incident of vaginal atrophy caused by decreased estrogen in menopausal women is growing, reaching 39%. The primary medical treatment of menopause-related vaginal atrophy is estrogen, which has a recognized therapeutic effect. Severe obstetric lacerations and trauma-related vaginal damage must be identified promptly and treated surgically. Radiotherapy-induced vaginal stenosis and adhesion could be treated with a vaginal dilator, however, there is a lack of consensus on therapy plans. Furthermore, surgical closure of genitourinary fistulas arise from the tumor or vaginal delivery is technically challenging. Stem cells have been proven to be effective in treating vaginal atrophy in animal models. Traditional treatments for Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, which is caused by a congenital anomaly of vaginal development, include vaginal dilation and vaginoplasty with autologous tissue. However, due to poor compliance and surgical complications, tissue engineering technology has received considerable attention for vaginal reconstruction because of its preferred characteristics. Nonetheless, the biological therapy of stem cell and tissue engineering technology still faces severe challenges, without application for clinical translation. Therefore, for women with vaginal injuries, the choice of treatment should be guided by the etiology and symptom severity. Stem cell therapy and tissue engineering technology show promising application prospects for vaginal injury repair and reconstruction, in addition to medical and surgical treatments. However, it is necessary to conduct additional pre-clinical animals and clinical trials in order to provide reliable references for future clinical practice.

Graphical Abstract

1. The etiologies of vaginal injuries include vaginal delivery, trauma, tumor, congenital anomaly of vaginal development and menopause.

2. Therapies vary depending on the underlying cause. Biological treatments for vaginal injuries, such as stem cell and tissue engineering technology, nevertheless face challenges because of limited research.

3. This review may provide leads for further exploration and application of various treatment methods for vaginal injuries.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The vagina is an essential part of the female internal genitalia, with important functions, i.e., sexual intercourse [1], and is a channel for menstrual blood discharge [2] and childbirth [3]. Furthermore, the vagina can prevent potentially invasive microorganisms, acting as a barrier to defense against genital tract infection [4]. The integrity of the vaginal wall and its pelvic floor support structure are indispensable for the anatomical position of organs and for maintaining pelvic floor function [56]. Therefore, the vagina is a crucial reproductive organ for women's health.

Women of various ages may sustain vaginal injuries due to different causes. Abnormal genital development, particularly congenital anomalies of vaginal development such as Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome, affects the women’s quality of life and sexual life [7], thus clinicians should not disregard the psychosexual impact of vagina aplasia. Vaginal delivery is the main way of female delivery, childbearing age women experience vaginal lacerations to varied degrees following vaginal delivery [8]. Because of hormone deficiency and aging, menopausal women suffer from vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), which affects women's daily lives as well as intimate relationships between couples [9]. Thus, vaginal health is critical for improving women’s physical, emotional and mental well-being.

Today, more and more researchers are focusing on vaginal injuries and functional anatomy recovery. There are numerous treatment options for vaginal injuries depending on their etiologies. However, vaginal injury repair faces a lot of challenges due to differing therapeutic effects and complications. This paper primarily reviews the research progress on epidemiology, etiologies, and treatment methods of vaginal injuries in recent years, and looks forward to provide more references for treatment selections.

Vaginal anatomy and embryogenesis origin

According to reports, the original hypothesis of uterovaginal embryogenesis was proposed by Müller in 1830, and the vagina had two origins: the cephalic part originated in the mesodermal Müllerian ducts, and the tailed part originated in the endodermal urogenital sinus [10]. The vagina is a naturally open cavity that extends from the vulva to the cervix of uterus in an upward and backward direction, forming a 90° angle with the uterus [610]. The length of anterior vaginal wall is 6 to 7.5 cm, while the length of posterior vaginal wall is approximately 9 cm. The vagina is surrounded by closed levator ani muscle tissue in front of the rectum and behind the bladder and urethra. The posterior wall links to the anal canal via the perineal body [10].

The vaginal wall has four layers. The epithelial layer is consisted of non-keratinized, stratified, squamous epithelial cell [6], playing a role in maintaining an acidic environment and providing immune barriers for women [1112]. The lamina propria is a dense connective tissue layer comprised of collagen and elastic fibers, abundant in blood vessels and lymphatics. The muscularis, surrounded by connective tissue, is made up of circular and longitudinal smooth muscle cells, when combined with the lamina propria, can provide the support strength to pelvic organs [6]. Adventitia (serosa) is the loose connective tissue layer composed of collagen and elastic fibers, blood vessels, lymphatic vessels and nerves, and it can separate the vaginal muscularis from paravaginal tissue [610]. The vaginal blood supply is adequate, mainly provided by the cervicovaginal artery and the vaginal artery of internal iliac arterial branches, meanwhile, the vagina has abundant venous plexuses [6], and it is easily bleeding and producing hematoma following vaginal injuries.

The epidemiology and etiologies of vaginal injuries

The etiologies of vaginal injuries are listed in Fig. 1 and include vaginal delivery, trauma, tumor, congenital anomaly of vaginal development and menopause. The epidemiology and etiologies of vaginal injuries are presented in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The etiologies of vaginal injuries. (Created with BioRender.com)

Table 1 Summary of epidemiology and etiologies of vaginal injuries

Vaginal delivery

Delivery injury is the most common cause of genital tract injuries in women of child-bearing age [13]. Lacerations are common in women undergoing vaginal deliveries, affecting 53–79% of women [81416]. The majority of vaginal delivery women experienced first-degree (perineal skin and vaginal mucosa laceration) and second-degree (perineal muscle laceration without anal sphincter complex damage) perineal lacerations [81516]. Perineal lacerations always involve the vaginal wall, specifically the vaginal posterior and lateral walls [8]. It has been reported that risk factors for an increase in vaginal lacerations during birth include parity, operative vaginal delivery, gestational age, nationality, and so on [1618]. Lacerations can result in perineal pain, bleeding, and hematoma formation [18], infection [19], urinary and fecal incontinence [20], and even sexual dysfunction [21].

Additionally, vaginal delivery can also cause severe damage to the reproductive tract, resulting in genitourinary fistulas that significantly reduce women's quality of life. Long-term compressing of the fetal head on the vagina and its surrounding tissues after vaginal birth causes widespread ischemic tissue injury and necrosis, which leads to the formation of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) and rectovaginal fistula (RVF) [22].VVF is an abnormal connection formed between bladder and vagina that results in urine flowing out of the vagina [23]. In developing countries, VVF is a common complication mainly due to prolonged labor during the delivery or obstructed labor [24].RVF leads to discharge of feces in the vagina because of the connection between rectum and vagina [25]. Birth injury is the main cause of RVF, and the incidence of RVF associated with childbirth varies from 0.2 to 4 cases per 1000 deliveries (0.02% to 0.4%) [26]. Severe perineal laceration and episiotomy injury to the anal sphincter can also result in the occurrence of RVF [2527]. Despite having a low frequency, obstetric fistulas negatively impacts on women’s physical, social and mental health, limiting women’s daily activities [232728].

Trauma

Trauma is the common cause of genital vaginal wall injuries in women. Compared to obstetric perineal-vaginal lacerations, non-obstetric vulvovaginal trauma (VVT) is extremely rare, with a rate of only 3.7%, which may be underestimated by researchers [29]. Straddle injuries are the most common type of unintentional genital injuries in children and adolescents [13], and occur when they fall in a straddle position and the urogenital area strikes the surface of a hard object. Straddle injuries can result in compression injuries to the vulvar soft tissues, as well as various degrees of vaginal lacerations and abrasions, pain and bleeding, vulvar hematoma, and dysuria [132930]. Sexual assault and abuse can also result in vaginal lacerations and acute blood loss, which should be diagnosed and treated as soon as possible [31]. Although genital injuries alone are rarely deadly, they can lead to chronic discomfort, painful intercourse, fistula formation, infertility, and even psychological problems. Therefore, early identification of the location and severity of genital trauma, as well as timely treatment, can help to minimize damage [1329].

Tumor

Tumor-induced vaginal injuries are classified into two types: surgery results in vaginal injuries such as changes in length and function, and radiation therapy results in changes in vaginal structure and function.

Vaginal length shortening occurs primarily in hysterectomy patients. The vaginal length of cervical cancer survivors were reduced by about 3 cm after radical hysterectomy of cancer [32]. Transvaginal hysterectomy for prolapse reduced vaginal length by roughly 1.7 cm, which is less than radical hysterectomy [33]. Shortening vaginal length can affect women’s sex lives. Jensen et al. [34] reported that radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma had an impact on women’s sexual intercourse, including dyspareunia, orgasm difficulty and sexual dissatisfaction because of decreased vaginal size.

Radiotherapy is an important part of the treatment of gynecologic malignancies, and brachytherapy (BT) is closed to the tumor tissue and treats cervical, endometrial, vaginal and vulvar cancers, especially cervical cancers at stage IB and above [35]. The proximal vagina is the primary site of endovaginal brachytherapy-related toxicities [36], which lead to vaginal fibrosis and atrophy [3237]. Women suffer from vaginal dryness, bleeding, pain [3839], vaginal stenosis (VS), decreased sexual activity and sexual dysfunction following radiotherapy [3740]. Vaginal stenosis (VS) is an obstruction of the vaginal canal formed by vaginal scar tissue. The overall incidence of radiotherapy-induced VS ranges from 2.5% to 88% [41]. The incidence of VS after radiotherapy are almost 50% in endometrial cancer women [42] and 60% in cervical cancer women [43]. The incidence of VS varies depending on tumor type, radiotherapy modality and dose, hormone levels, use of dilators, and so on [41]. If vaginal fibrosis and adhesion further worsen, radiotherapy may result in full vaginal obliteration, affecting women’s quality of life and sexual function [44]. Severe vaginal necrosis occurs primarily in the late stage of radiotherapy injury, with an incidence of 3% to 6%, and can result in serious complications such as necrosis-associated bladder or rectal fistula, perforation, or even death [45].

Excessive electrocoagulation and lateral thermal spread during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy can also cause vaginal and urinary tissue injuries, leading to fistula formation [46]. The incidence of VVF after radical hysterectomy varies from 0.3% to 2.61% [4650]. Therefore, in order to reduce the risk of genitourinary fistulas, a thorough examination and diagnosis of urinary injuries should be performed before the end of operation [51]. Although genitourinary fistulas are rare, they can result in depression, anxiety and a decline in women’s mental health [23], as well as an increase in secondary surgery and readmission rate [52]. Furthermore, genitourinary fistulas may cause patients to delay adjuvant therapy, affecting women’s short-term survival [53].

Congenital anomaly of vaginal development

In addition to acquired diseases including trauma and cancer, the absence of the normal vagina primarily arises from congenital vaginal aplasia, especially MRKH syndrome [54]. MRKH syndrome is a female congenital disease with Müllerian duct aplasia, marked by agenesis or aplasia of uterus and vagina’s upper part, and a 46,XX chromosome karyotype in women [55]. The prevalence of MRKH syndrome is approximately 1/5000 in live female births [56]. In most cases, MRKH syndrome is diagnosed with primary amenorrhea, which places a psychological burden on young women and affects their sex lives [57]. Complications from vaginoplasty for vaginal agenesis can lead to a variety of vaginal injuries, including graft rejection or necrosis [58], VS, fistula formation [59], prolapse, and reoperation [60]. Transverse and longitudinal vaginal septum can also result in hematocolpos, if not diagnosed and treated promptly, women may experience long-term severe pelvic pain and late fertility problems [61].

Menopause

Menopause is a natural process that all women go through as their estrogen levels decline. Menopausal women are frequently accompanied with urinary symptoms and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) as a result of estrogen decline [6263]. Women with anterior vaginal prolapse, the most common type of POP, have altered vaginal thickness, mechanical properties, and structural composition [6466]. Zhu et al [66] used single-cell RNA sequencing to show the cellular composition of the vaginal wall in women with POP. They detected that fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells were the most abundant, the morphology of the vaginal wall was changed at every layer and muscularis showed atrophy in POP women. Yu et al [67] also revealed changes in the overall structure of the vaginal wall caused by a bilateral ovariectomized rat model, such as thinning of the vaginal epithelial layer and adventitia layer, sparsely deposited collagen in the lamina propria, and disordered and reduced smooth muscle, all of which contributed to a reduction in vaginal support and POP development.

Estrogen insufficiency can also cause vaginal atrophy (VA) in postmenopausal women, with an incidence of 39%, which is accompanied by vaginal itching, dryness, and dyspareunia [636869]. VA, sometimes also known as VVA, has a negative effect on women’s sexual health and quality of life, over half of them have never received treatment because they may be embarrassed to seek medical attention [68]. As a result, in order to further diagnose and treat VA, clinicians should give it enough attention. In the meantime, clinical practice should include measures of the pH value and vaginal maturation index in addition to symptom assessment [69].

Treatments of vaginal injuries

The treatment methods of vaginal injuries vary depending on the etiology, and include medical treatment, physical treatment, surgical treatment and biological treatment.

Medical treatment

The main medications used to treat vaginal injuries are estrogen, hyaluronic acid, and growth factor, and the mechanisms involved in each treatment are detailed in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Medical treatments of vaginal injuries. NOS nitric oxide synthase, VIP vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, FGF fibroblast growth factor, bFGF basic fibroblast growth factor, KGF keratinocyte growth factor (also named as FGF-7), KGFR keratinocyte growth factor receptor, HA hyaluronic acid, P-AKT phosphorylated protein kinase B, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor, EGF epidermal growth factor, PDGF-B platelet-derived growth factor-B, TGF-β1 transforming growth factor beta1, hCTGF human connective tissue growth factor. (Created with BioRender.com)

Estrogen

Estrogen regulates vaginal physiology predominantly through the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) [7071]. Estrogen therapy is beneficial for VA and stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and it improves the vaginal wound healing of POP and other vaginal surgeries including urinary incontinence and vaginal fistula surgery [6372], thus it is widely utilized nowadays.

Estrogen can reduce wound size and inflammation [7374] expedite epithelialization and increase vaginal wall thickness, promote angiogenesis and collagen synthesis, enhance vaginal tissue strength, and maintain vaginal tissue integrity. The positive effects of estrogen therapy on vaginal wound healing are essential for maintaining pelvic organ position and preventing POP recurrence [72]. Local estrogen therapy plays a role in improving vaginal microcirculation in VVA women [75], and is the most effective therapy for non-mild VVA [70]. Estrogen can dilate blood vessels, increase vaginal blood flow, and improve vaginal lubrication through NOS and VIP pathways [76] (Fig. 2). The vaginal application of estrogen after radiotherapy promotes the regeneration of vaginal epithelium, which may be more remarkable when estrogen is given in women more than 3 months after radiotherapy [77]. It is worth noting that radiation-induced alterations in vaginal morphology diminish the efficacy of vaginal estrogen treatment because pelvic radiotherapy decreases the expression of vaginal estrogen receptors [4478]. Due to the risk of recurrence and side events in different tumors, there is limited evidence supporting the use of local and systemic estrogen therapy in women with gynecologic tumors [44].

Hyaluronic acid

Hyaluronic acid (HA), a basic component of extracellular matrix (ECM), is an effective vaginal pharmaceutical agent with moisturizing and lubricating properties. It may be appropriate for women with VA who have contraindications to estrogen treatment, as well as for other diseases that affect vaginal symptoms and signs. HA can effectively alleviate symptoms such as vaginal pain, itching, burning, dryness, and bleeding [79]. Liu et al [80] demonstrated that local injection of HA vaginal gel effectively relieved symptoms of VA in a postmenopausal rat model while also enhancing vaginal epithelium repair. Furthermore, higher expression of P-AKT and VEGF in vaginal tissue suggested that HA may treat vaginal injuries by promoting angiogenesis (Fig. 2).

HA could improve vaginal health in women who experience vaginal injuries from cancer and radiotherapy. It promotes vaginal epithelial regeneration, enhances vaginal elasticity and lubrication, and reduces vaginal adhesions and obliterations. Given its safety and absence of contraindications, HA is used to repair tissue injuries [44]. Laliscia et al [81] discovered that local therapy with HA was helpful in reducing vaginal toxicities in endometrial cancer patients undergoing postoperative vaginal BT and was recommended to be administered from the start of BT until at least two weeks after completion. Delia et al [82] also demonstrated that vaginal use of HA suppositories decreased radiotherapy-induced vaginal discomfort and facilitated the repair of vaginal mucosa in patients with cervical cancer, potentially assisting women in completing radiation therapy. More high-quality clinical research on the usefulness of HA for vaginal injuries is necessary in the future.

Growth factor

Numerous studies have been conducted on the positive effects of growth factors on vaginal wound healing, with fibroblast growth factor (FGF) being the most extensively studied at present. Vaginal wound healing involves modulating ECM metabolism. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) promotes cell proliferation, stem cell differentiate into fibroblast and collagen production, nonetheless, better POP animal models are needed to demonstrate bFGF’s therapeutic impact in enhancing vaginal wound healing [83]. Interestingly, multiple clinical investigations indicated that FGF/bFGF had an influence on neovaginal epithelialization in women having vaginoplasty for MRKH syndrome and played a major role in the regeneration of vaginal tissue when combined with biomaterials [8485]. Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) is a member of the FGF family, commonly known as FGF-7. It is produced by mesenchymal cells and has a mitogenic effect on uterine and vaginal epithelial cells [8687]. KGF has been shown to enhance vaginal epithelial cell proliferation, thicken the epithelial layer in neonatal mice, and generate long-term impacts on the vaginal epithelium [86]. KGF and estrogen have similar effects in treating VA, possible due to the interaction between estrogen and KGF receptors and changes in intracellular ER-α distribution. Based on the murine model, KGF may be a possible alternative treatment for VA compared with estrogen because it has no systemic negative effects [88]. Similarly, epidermal growth factor (EGF), an essential mediator of estrogen activity, promotes cell growth in the reproductive tract in a manner similar to estrogen [89]. Transforming growth factor beta1(TGF-β1) is a significant mediator of wound repair in skin tissue, and is also involved in vaginal wound repair process [90]. Transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-α) regulates the development and morphogenesis of Müllerian ducts and urogenital sinus, potentially contributing to reproductive tract disorders [91]. Meanwhile, platelet-derived growth factor-B (PDGF-B) was found to be significantly associated with vaginal wound closure [92]. In vitro, recombinant human connective tissue growth factor (hCTGF) can influence the expression of collagen I and III and induce ADSC differentiation, making it potentially beneficial in the POP therapy [93] (Fig. 2). More clinical trials are required to conduct and confirm the safety and efficacy of growth factors in vaginal injury repair, as the majority of existing studies are carried out on animals.

Physical treatment

When patients do not benefit from local estrogen treatment or have contraindications to horm one therapy, laser may be an effective alternative treatment for VVA. Acute thermo-ablative damage and proliferation are the two stages of the CO2 laser system. The laser is used to promote the synthesis of collagen and ECM in the injury site, increase the elasticity of the vaginal wall, and relieves vaginal discomfort symptom [94]. Similarly, Samuels et al [95] discovered that fractional CO2 laser treatment can improve symptoms of VVA in postmenopausal women, increase the submucosal vascularization, collagen and elastic fiber content in the vagina, and is better tolerated by women. CO2 laser treatment could also improve vaginal discomfort in cancer and radiotherapy patients. In a prospective research, Perrone et al [96] discovered that intravaginal non-ablative CO2 laser therapy increased the vaginal length and improved vaginal health index in genital cancer women after pelvic radiotherapy. Quick et al [97] performed fractional CO2 laser therapy on gynecologic cancer patients with sexual dysfunction and discovered that women’s sexual function improved after treatment, and CO2 laser therapy was relatively safe without serious side effect. However, study sample sizes for vaginal injuries followed by laser treatment were small, and larger future studies with long-term follow-up are needed to demonstrate effectiveness.

Surgical treatment

In addition to superficial and hemostatic lacerations, vaginal wall lacerations caused by vaginal delivery should be sutured to avoid persistent bleeding or anatomical malformation. The apex of the vaginal laceration should be identified. Interrupted or continuous sutures are positioned 1 cm above the apex to close the vaginal mucosa and the underlying fascia, ultimately achieving the hemostasis and restoring vaginal anatomic structure [9899].

Non-obstetric VVT could lead to vulvovaginal hematoma formation. When vulvovaginal injury occurs, the decision to operate or not should be dependent on the severity of the trauma, the size of the hematoma, and bleeding. If the hematoma continues to grow, it should be surgically removed, bleeding vessels must be ligated, and sutures should be used to heal vulvovaginal tissues, avoiding necrosis and secondary infections of tissues [13100]. If the hematoma is restricted to a small anatomical area and there is no active bleeding, substantial enlargement, or dysuria, ice packs may be used as a conservative treatment [13101102].

Radiotherapy-induced vaginal stenosis or adhesion could be treated with vaginal dilation using a vaginal dilator, which works by expanding the vaginal tissue, stimulating the growth of vaginal epithelium, and preventing fibrosis and elastic degeneration [41]. Vaginal dilator therapy (VDT) is beneficial to maintain vaginal length and improve sexual function after radiation therapy [103]. However, there is no consensus on the type of vaginal dilator, initiation timing after radiotherapy, the duration of usage, or the method of application [44]. Bakker et al [104] considered that the use of vaginal dilators should begin 4 weeks after radiotherapy and last 9 to 12 months to prevent vaginal adhesion and shortening, and that plastic dilator sets were the best appropriate option for VDT. In another study, vaginal dilator was used at the beginning of radiotherapy or 4 weeks after radiotherapy for 3 months to relieve patients’ vaginal dryness [105]. Matos et al [106] believed that the method of vaginal dilation should be personalized and utilized with lubricants indefinitely, depending on the need of patients. Unfortunately, women undergoing radiotherapy have poor adherence to vaginal dilators, which is related to psychological burden such as embarrassment, anxiety, pain and fear of vaginal injury [107]. Long-term intervention trials are required to further understand standardized vaginal dilation techniques and find effective and optimal vaginal dilation treatments [108]. Additionally, vaginal anatomical defects caused by vaginal stenosis after radiation therapy can be restored by forming a vaginal pouch with absorbable sutures, achieving vaginal reconstruction [109].

Surgery can successfully repair VVF with a urinary continence rate of 87.09% [28]. Conservative treatment for VVF consists primarily of an indwelling catheter, which is more successful when the fistula is less than 4 mm [110]. RVF is rarely self-healing, and surgical repair has a success rate of about 55%, with the key to success being a proper diagnosis and surgery plan [111]. Fistula surgery is technically difficult, and closing the pelvic fistula does not ensure control of urination or defecation because fistulas may cause damage to bowel and bladder tissue [112].

The first-line treatment for MRKH syndrome is vaginal dilation, whereas the second-line treatment is surgical development of a neovagina. If vaginal dilatation fails or patient does not comply with treatment, surgery will be a choice [113114]. The most traditional approach to vaginal reconstruction in women with congenital absence of the vagina is to create a neovagina using vaginoplasty between bladder and rectum, with grafts such as skin [115], buccal mucosa [116], peritoneum [117], and bowel [118]. The choice of grafts greatly influences the outcome of surgery, however, autologous tissue may not be the optimal choice for vaginoplasty because of side effects and complications. Ideal vaginal reconstruction requires the rehabilitation of vaginal morphology and function, as well as the regeneration of smooth muscle and nerve tissue. Tissue engineering technology provides new therapy possibilities for vaginal reconstruction [54]. However, vaginal repair with new grafted tissues will be a significant challenge for clinicians in the future [119]. Figure 3 summarizes various surgical treatment methods for vaginal injuries.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Surgical treatments for vaginal injuries. MRKH syndrome Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.(Created with BioRender.com)

Biological treatment

Stem cell therapy

Stem cell therapy has been used to improve the biological function of damaged tissue in medical fields due to its paracrine activity and targeted differentiation potential [120121]. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) become the seed cells for vaginal reconstruction [54]. MSCs can differentiate into endothelial-like cells and smooth muscle cells in vitro, both of which are essential components in vaginal reconstruction and vascularization, and participate in the repair process of vaginal injury [122]. To present, the most common MSCs used for vaginal injury repair are bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cell (BMDSC), adipose derived mesenchymal stem cell (ADMSC), and human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (HUMSC). These investigations on vaginal repair and reconstruction with MSCs have mainly focused on animal models. Kasap et al [123] used the rat oophorectomy menopause model and discovered that injection of ADMSC and BMDSC into the below vaginal mucosa increased the thickness of the vaginal epithelium and improved vaginal atrophy, with ADMSC being more effective than BMDSC. Mao et al [124] detected that mRNA levels of angiogenic factors (bFGF/VEGF) were significantly increased in the vaginal wall of ovariectomized rats injected with HUMSCs, implying that paracrine effects of HUMSCs may repair the vaginal wall’s fibromuscular structure. In a similar oophorectomy menopause model of rhesus macaques, Zhang et al [120] demonstrated that injecting HUMSCs into the vaginal wall can repair vaginal tissue by promoting ECM growth, neovascularization, and smooth muscle content increase, as well as improving the vagina wall’s biomechanical property. Figure 4 summarizes the role of MSCs in vaginal injury repair in the animal model. Although MSCs have the capacity to heal poor vagina tissue, the mechanism remains to be fully understood. Stem cell therapy, if used on patients, still has certain problems that need to be addressed and improved, including the ethical concerns about cell sources, immune tolerance and rejection between stem cells and the female body, safety, and the assessment of proliferation and differentiation ability after stem cell therapy [125].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Stem cell therapy for vaginal injuries. ADMSCs adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells, HUMSCs human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, BMDSCs bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells, ECM extracellular matrix. (Created with BioRender.com)

Tissue engineering technology

Congenital anomaly of vaginal development, particularly MRKH syndrome, could be treated with vaginoplasty using autologous tissue. However due to a paucity of suitable donor tissue, surgical failures, and complications [119126], vaginal reconstruction with tissue grafts remains challenging. Implanted support structures can be used for surgical therapy in women with POP, and nonabsorbable polypropylene (PP) mesh was the most commonly used material in clinical practice [119127]. PP mesh can provide mechanical support for the vaginal wall [119], however its clinical application is limited by the non-degradability and complications such as mesh erosion, exposure, chronic pain and infection. The American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced the termination of PP mesh [128].

Tissue engineering technology is a considered therapy option that has been gradually applied to the studies of vaginal injury repair and vaginal reconstruction [54]. Tissue engineering involves using a compound of cells, growth factors/drugs, and biomaterials to treat tissue damage [129]. The role of cells is to accelerate repair, promote the production of connective tissue and regeneration of damaged tissue. Bioactive factors, especially growth factors, could activate stem cells, induce differentiation and promote tissue regeneration. Biomaterials used to repair damaged pelvic floor tissues have a role in providing supportive power for the vagina and transporting cells to damaged tissues [129130].

Mammalian tissue healing requires the ECM, and biological scaffolds that mimic the natural ECM have been used to provide a three-dimensional matrix structure for vaginal tissue repair, allowing cells to adhere, proliferate and differentiate [129]. Biological scaffold materials primarily include synthetic and natural materials, produced by decellularization and self-assembly, as well as electrospinning techniques, to restore vaginal function and improve the integrity of vaginal wall by combining vaginal seed cells and/or growth factors [119131132]. To date, there have been only a few clinical studies using biomaterials for patients with MRKH syndrome and POP, and therapeutic effects are uncertain due to the small number of patients and short follow-up period [8485133]. The majority of these studies were carried out in large and small animal experiments, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2 The applications of biological materials for vaginal injuries

Tissue-engineered biological scaffold materials that lack immunogenicity are more biocompatible and biodegradable than PP mesh, with a certain mechanical quality and good ability to promote tissue regeneration (Fig. 5). Despite the benefits of tissue engineering technology, there are several limits to its clinical translation application, such as cell and growth factor selection and the generation of desirable biological scaffolds [130]. As a result, more large-scale preclinical animal and clinical research is needed to advance the further development of engineering technology for vaginal injury and reconstruction.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Tissue engineering technology in the treatment of vaginal injuries. ECM extracellular matrix. (created with BioRender.com)

Conclusion and prospect

Different etiologies of vaginal injuries negatively affect women's mental health and quality of life across age groups. Estrogen is the most commonly used medicine for vaginal injuries, particularly vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women, the therapeutic benefit is obvious, however it has limited application in women with gynecologic tumors, hyaluronic acid or laser therapy may become alternative replacement therapies in the future. Vaginal delivery is the most prevalent cause of vaginal injuries, thus clinical personnel should pay greater attention to labor protection and management, identify the laceration degree, and improve suture techniques, which will be beneficial to reduce postpartum complications. Similarly, trauma-related vaginal injury requires an accurate assessment of the injury site and severity, and timely treatment.

Stem cell therapy shows promise when compared to traditional vaginal injury treatments. Tissue engineering technology, as an advanced scientific research area, brings new expectations to vaginal reconstruction in women with MRKH syndrome due to its superior ability of tissue regeneration. However, most of studies on these new therapies have been limited to cell and animal experiments, with only a few tiny clinical trials. As a result, further research should be made to confirm their therapeutic efficacy and safety in the future.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Bronselaer G, Callens N, De Sutter P, et al. Self-assessment of genital anatomy and sexual function within a Belgian, Dutch-speaking female population: a validation study. J Sex Med. 2013;10(12):3006–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wagner G, Ottesen B. Vaginal physiology during menstruation. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96(6 Pt 2):921–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alves ÁLL, Silva LBD, Filho BJA, et al. Operative vaginal delivery. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023;45(7):422–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Linhares IM, Summers PR, Larsen B, et al. Contemporary perspectives on vaginal pH and lactobacilli. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(2):120.e121-125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Palma PCR, Monteiro MVC, Ledesma MA, et al. Treatment of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Using Transvaginal Anterior Mesh With Apical Fixation: A Prospective Multicenter Study With up to 2 Years of Follow-up. Int Neurourol J. 2018;22(3):177–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Krantz KE. The gross and microscopic anatomy of the human vagina. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1959;83:89–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weijenborg PTM, Kluivers KB, Dessens AB, et al. Sexual functioning, sexual esteem, genital self-image and psychological and relational functioning in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: a case-control study. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(9):1661–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ulhe SC, Acharya N, Vats A, et al. Study of Vulvovaginal Atrophy and Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause and Its Impact on the Quality of Life of Postmenopausal Women in Central India. Cureus. 2024;16(2): e54802.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Maseroli E, Vignozzi L. Testosterone and Vaginal Function. Sex Med Rev. 2020;8(3):379–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Godha K, Tucker KM, Biehl C, et al. Human vaginal pH and microbiota: an update. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018;34(6):451–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson DJ, Marathe J, Pudney J. The structure of the human vaginal stratum corneum and its role in immune defense. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014;71(6):618–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lopez HN, Focseneanu MA, Merritt DF. Genital injuries acute evaluation and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;48:28–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 198: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):e87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rogers R G, Leeman L M, Borders N, et al. Contribution of the second stage of labour to pelvic floor dysfunction: a prospective cohort comparison of nulliparous women . Bjog, 2014, 121(9): 1145-1153; discussion 1154.

  16. Vale de Castro Monteiro M, Pereira G M, Aguiar R A, et al. Risk factors for severe obstetric perineal lacerations . Int Urogynecol J, 2016, 27(1): 61-67.

  17. Myrick TG, Sandri KJ. Epidural Analgesia and Any Vaginal Laceration. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(5):768–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi M, Talebian A, Sadat Z, et al. Perineal trauma: incidence and its risk factors. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;39(2):206–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gommesen D, Nohr EA, Drue HC, et al. Obstetric perineal tears: risk factors, wound infection and dehiscence: a prospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(1):67–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Borello-France D, Burgio KL, Richter HE, et al. Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(4):863–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huber M, Tunón K, Lindqvist M. “From hell to healed” - A qualitative study on women’s experience of recovery, relationships and sexuality after severe obstetric perineal injury. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2022;33: 100736.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ngongo CJ, Raassen T, Lombard L, et al. Delivery mode for prolonged, obstructed labour resulting in obstetric fistula: a retrospective review of 4396 women in East and Central Africa. Bjog. 2020;127(6):702–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujisaki A, Kinjo M, Shimoinaba M, et al. An evaluation of the impact of post-hysterectomy vesicovaginal fistula repair on the mental health of patients in a developed country. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(7):1371–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wall LL. Obstetric vesicovaginal fistula as an international public-health problem. Lancet. 2006;368(9542):1201–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Das B, Snyder M. Rectovaginal Fistulae. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016;29(1):50–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Dawes AJ, Jensen CC. Rectovaginal Fistulas Secondary to Obstetrical Injury. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021;34(1):28–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ryoo SB, Oh HK, Ha HK, et al. Outcomes of surgical treatments for rectovaginal fistula and prognostic factors for successful closure: a single-center tertiary hospital experiences. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019;97(3):149–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Shrestha DB, Budhathoki P, Karki P, et al. Vesico-Vaginal Fistula in Females in 2010–2020: a Systemic Review and Meta-analysis. Reprod Sci. 2022;29(12):3346–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jones IS, O’Connor A. Non-obstetric vulval trauma. Emerg Med Australas. 2013;25(1):36–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Saxena AK, Steiner M, Höllwarth ME. Straddle injuries in female children and adolescents: 10-year accident and management analysis. Indian J Pediatr. 2014;81(8):766–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Abraham M, Kondis J, Merritt DF. Case Series: Vaginal Rupture Injuries after Sexual Assault in Children and Adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29(3):e49-52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hofsjö A, Bohm-Starke N, Blomgren B, et al. Radiotherapy-induced vaginal fibrosis in cervical cancer survivors. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(5):661–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Abdelmonem AM. Vaginal length and incidence of dyspareunia after total abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151(2):190–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jensen PT, Groenvold M, Klee MC, et al. Early-stage cervical carcinoma, radical hysterectomy, and sexual function. A longitudinal study Cancer. 2004;100(1):97–106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bhatia R, Lichter KE, Gurram L, et al. The state of gynecologic radiation therapy in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022;32(3):421–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. van den Heerik A, Horeweg N, Creutzberg CL, et al. Vaginal brachytherapy management of stage I and II endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022;32(3):304–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hofsjö A, Bergmark K, Blomgren B, et al. Radiotherapy for cervical cancer - impact on the vaginal epithelium and sexual function. Acta Oncol. 2018;57(3):338–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sorbe B, Straumits A, Karlsson L. Intravaginal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for stage I endometrial cancer: a randomized study of two dose-per-fraction levels. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62(5):1385–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Aguilera MDV, Rovirosa Á, Ascaso C, et al. Late G2 vagina toxicity in post-operative endometrial carcinoma is associated with a 68 Gy dose equivalent to 2 Gy per fraction((α/β=3Gy)) at 2 cm(3) of vagina. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2018;10(1):40–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Akbaba S, Oelmann-Avendano JT, Krug D, et al. The impact of vaginal dilator use on vaginal stenosis and sexual quality of life in women treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for endometrial cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2019;195(10):902–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Damast S, Jeffery DD, Son CH, et al. Literature Review of Vaginal Stenosis and Dilator Use in Radiation Oncology. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019;9(6):479–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Bahng AY, Dagan A, Bruner DW, et al. Determination of prognostic factors for vaginal mucosal toxicity associated with intravaginal high-dose rate brachytherapy in patients with endometrial cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(2):667–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kirchheiner K, Nout RA, Lindegaard JC, et al. Dose-effect relationship and risk factors for vaginal stenosis after definitive radio(chemo)therapy with image-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer in the EMBRACE study. Radiother Oncol. 2016;118(1):160–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Varytė G, Bartkevičienė D. Pelvic Radiation Therapy Induced Vaginal Stenosis: A Review of Current Modalities and Recent Treatment Advances . Medicina (Kaunas), 2021, 57(4).

  45. Jia AY, Viswanathan AN. Vaginal necrosis: A rare late toxicity after radiation therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;160(2):602–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Liang C, Liu P, Kang S, et al. Risk factors for and delayed recognition of genitourinary fistula following radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a population-based analysis. J Gynecol Oncol. 2023;34(2): e20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Liang C, Liu P, Cui Z, et al. Effect of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy on major surgical complications in women with stage IA-IIB cervical cancer in China, 2004–2015. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;156(1):115–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Likic IS, Kadija S, Ladjevic NG, et al. Analysis of urologic complications after radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):644.e641-643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Chong GO, Park NY, Hong DG, et al. Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison of the first 50 and second 50 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(8):1459–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hwang JH, Lim MC, Joung JY, et al. Urologic complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(11):1605–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sharp HT, Adelman MR. Prevention, Recognition, and Management of Urologic Injuries During Gynecologic Surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(6):1085–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bretschneider CE, Casas-Puig V, Sheyn D, et al. Delayed recognition of lower urinary tract injuries following hysterectomy for benign indications: A NSQIP-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(2):132.e131-132.e113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Liu P, Liang C, Lu A, et al. Risk factors and long-term impact of urologic complications during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in China, 2004–2016. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;158(2):294–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang N, Qin X, Zhang J, et al. Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Accelerate the Morphological and Functional Recovery of Neovaginas. Artif Organs. 2018;42(12):1206–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Herlin MK, Petersen MB, Brännström M. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: a comprehensive update. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):214.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Herlin M, Bjørn AM, Rasmussen M, et al. Prevalence and patient characteristics of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: a nationwide registry-based study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(10):2384–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tsitoura A, Michala L. The Sexuality of Adolescents and Young Women With MRKH Syndrome: A Qualitative Study. J Sex Med. 2021;18(12):2012–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. AmiesOelschlager AM, Kirby A, Breech L. Evaluation and management of vaginoplasty complications. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;29(5):316–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Davies MC, Creighton SM, Woodhouse CR. The pitfalls of vaginal construction. BJU Int. 2005;95(9):1293–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang H, Lau HH, Su TH. Single-incision mesh repair for the treatment of neovaginal prolapse. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;53(3):417–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Louden ED, Awonuga AO, Gago LA, et al. Rare Müllerian Anomaly: Complete Septate Uterus with Simultaneous Longitudinal and Transverse Vaginal Septa. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28(6):e189-191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. Jama. 2008;300(11):1311–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Weber MA, Kleijn MH, Langendam M, et al. Local Oestrogen for Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2015;10(9): e0136265.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Bray R, Derpapas A, Fernando R, et al. Does the vaginal wall become thinner as prolapse grade increases? Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(3):397–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Knight KM, Moalli PA, Nolfi A, et al. Impact of parity on ewe vaginal mechanical properties relative to the nonhuman primate and rodent. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(8):1255–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Li Y, Zhang QY, Sun BF, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of the vaginal wall in women with severe anterior vaginal prolapse. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Yu X, He L, Lin W, et al. Long-term menopause exacerbates vaginal wall support injury in ovariectomized rats by regulating amino acid synthesis and glycerophospholipid metabolism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1119599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Nappi RE, Kokot-Kierepa M. Women’s voices in the menopause: results from an international survey on vaginal atrophy. Maturitas. 2010;67(3):233–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Weber MA, Limpens J, Roovers JP. Assessment of vaginal atrophy: a review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(1):15–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Management of symptomatic vulvovaginal atrophy: 2013 position statement of The North American Menopause Society . Menopause, 2013, 20(9): 888-902; quiz 903-884.

  71. Gebhart J B, Rickard D J, Barrett T J, et al. Expression of estrogen receptor isoforms alpha and beta messenger RNA in vaginal tissue of premenopausal and postmenopausal women . Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 185(6): 1325-1330; discussion 1330-1321.

  72. Vodegel EV, Kastelein AW, Jansen C, et al. The effects of oestrogen on vaginal wound healing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;41(1):115–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ashcroft GS, Greenwell-Wild T, Horan MA, et al. Topical estrogen accelerates cutaneous wound healing in aged humans associated with an altered inflammatory response. Am J Pathol. 1999;155(4):1137–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Horng H C, Chang W H, Yeh C C, et al. Estrogen Effects on Wound Healing . Int J Mol Sci, 2017, 18(11).

  75. Diedrich CM, Kastelein AW, Verri FM, et al. Effects of topical estrogen therapy on the vaginal microcirculation in women with vulvovaginal atrophy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(5):1298–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Costagliola A, Liguori G, Nassauw LV. Neuronal control of the vagina in vertebrates: A review. Acta Histochem. 2023;125(1): 151988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Denton A S, Maher E J. Interventions for the physical aspects of sexual dysfunction in women following pelvic radiotherapy . Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2003, 2003(1): Cd003750.

  78. Hofsjö A, Bohm-Starke N, Bergmark K, et al. Sex steroid hormone receptor expression in the vaginal wall in cervical cancer survivors after radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(8):1107–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Buzzaccarini G, Marin L, Noventa M, et al. Hyaluronic acid in vulvar and vaginal administration: evidence from a literature systematic review. Climacteric. 2021;24(6):560–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Liu SB, Liu SL, Gan XL, et al. The effects of hyaluronic acid vaginal gel on the vaginal epithelium of ovariectomized rats. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31(3):208–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Laliscia C, Delishaj D, Fabrini MG, et al. Acute and late vaginal toxicity after adjuvant high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy in patients with intermediate risk endometrial cancer: is local therapy with hyaluronic acid of clinical benefit? J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2016;8(6):512–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Delia P, Sansotta G, Pontoriero A, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Low-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronic Acid-Based Treatment on Onset of Acute Side Effects in Women Receiving Adjuvant Radiotherapy after Cervical Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Oncol Res Treat. 2019;42(4):217–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. van Velthoven MJJ, Gudde AN, Struijs F, et al. The Effect of Growth Factors on Vaginal Wound Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2023;29(4):429–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Nagata T, Kawano A, Koyama M, et al. Efficacy of Fibroblast Growth Factor on Epithelialization of the Neovagina in Patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome Who Underwent Vaginoplasty. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30(3):400–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Noguchi S, Nakatsuka M, Sugiyama Y, et al. Use of artificial dermis and recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor for creating a neovagina in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(7):1629–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Hom YK, Young P, Thomson AA, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor injected into female mouse neonates stimulates uterine and vaginal epithelial growth. Endocrinology. 1998;139(9):3772–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Masui F, Matsuda M, Mori T. Involvement of keratinocyte growth factor (KGF)-KGF receptor signaling in developmental estrogenization syndrome of mouse vagina. Cell Tissue Res. 2004;318(3):591–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Ceccarelli S, D’Amici S, Vescarelli E, et al. Topical KGF treatment as a therapeutic strategy for vaginal atrophy in a model of ovariectomized mice. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18(9):1895–907.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Nelson KG, Takahashi T, Bossert NL, et al. Epidermal growth factor replaces estrogen in the stimulation of female genital-tract growth and differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(1):21–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Abramov Y, Hirsch E, Ilievski V, et al. Transforming growth factor β 1 gene expression during vaginal vs cutaneous surgical woundexpression during vaginal vs cutaneous surgical wound healing in the rabbit. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(4):671–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Gray K, Bullock B, Dickson R, et al. Potentiation of diethylstilbestrol-induced alterations in the female mouse reproductive tract by transforming growth factor-alpha transgene expression. Mol Carcinog. 1996;17(3):163–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Abramov Y, Hirsch E, Ilievski V, et al. Expression of platelet-derived growth factor-B mRNA during vaginal vs. dermal incisional wound healing in the rabbit . Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2012, 162(2): 216-220.

  93. Wang S, Gao J, Wang M, et al. Anti-inflammatory effect of adipose-derived stem cells in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. J Int Med Res. 2019;47(12):6303–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Perino A, Calligaro A, Forlani F, et al. Vulvo-vaginal atrophy: a new treatment modality using thermo-ablative fractional CO2 laser. Maturitas. 2015;80(3):296–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Samuels JB, Garcia MA. Treatment to External Labia and Vaginal Canal With CO2 Laser for Symptoms of Vulvovaginal Atrophy in Postmenopausal Women. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(1):83–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Perrone A M, Tesei M, Ferioli M, et al. Results of a Phase I-II Study on Laser Therapy for Vaginal Side Effects after Radiotherapy for Cancer of Uterine Cervix or Endometrium . Cancers (Basel), 2020, 12(6).

  97. Quick AM, Dockter T, Le-Rademacher J, et al. Pilot study of fractional CO(2) laser therapy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause in gynecologic cancer survivors. Maturitas. 2021;144:37–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Arnold MJ, Sadler K, Leli K. Obstetric Lacerations: Prevention and Repair. Am Fam Physician. 2021;103(12):745–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Leeman L, Spearman M, Rogers R. Repair of obstetric perineal lacerations. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68(8):1585–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Merritt DF. Genital trauma in children and adolescents. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;51(2):237–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Gambhir S, Grigorian A, Schubl S, et al. Analysis of non-obstetric vaginal and vulvar trauma: risk factors for operative intervention. Updates Surg. 2019;71(4):735–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Eyk NV, Allen L, Giesbrecht E, et al. Pediatric vulvovaginal disorders: a diagnostic approach and review of the literature. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009;31(9):850–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Quinn BA, Deng X, Sullivan SA, et al. Change in vaginal length and sexual function in women who undergo surgery ± radiation therapy for endometrial cancer. Brachytherapy. 2023;22(3):334–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Bakker RM, ter Kuile MM, Vermeer WM, et al. Sexual rehabilitation after pelvic radiotherapy and vaginal dilator use: consensus using the Delphi method. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(8):1499–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Cerentini T M, Schlöttgen J, Viana da Rosa P, et al. Clinical and Psychological Outcomes of the Use of Vaginal Dilators After Gynaecological Brachytherapy: a Randomized Clinical Trial . Adv Ther, 2019, 36(8): 1936-1949.

  106. Matos S R L, Lucas Rocha Cunha M, Podgaec S, et al. Consensus for vaginal stenosis prevention in patients submitted to pelvic radiotherapy . PLoS One, 2019, 14(8): e0221054.

  107. Cullen K, Fergus K, Dasgupta T, et al. From “sex toy” to intrusive imposition: a qualitative examination of women’s experiences with vaginal dilator use following treatment for gynecological cancer. J Sex Med. 2012;9(4):1162–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Liu M, Juravic M, Mazza G, et al. Vaginal Dilators: Issues and Answers. Sex Med Rev. 2021;9(2):212–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Vazquez S, Padilla-Iserte P, Marina T, et al. Creatsas modified vaginoplasty as reconstructive treatment of vaginal stenosis due to vaginal or pelvic radiotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020;30(8):1249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Kumar A, Goyal NK, Das SK, et al. Our experience with genitourinary fistulae. Urol Int. 2009;82(4):404–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Serna-Gallegos T, Jeppson PC. Female Pelvic Fistulae. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021;48(3):557–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Rogers RG, Jeppson PC. Current Diagnosis and Management of Pelvic Fistulae in Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):635–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Triantafyllidi V E, Mavrogianni D, Kalampalikis A, et al. Identification of Genetic Causes in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature . Children (Basel), 2022, 9(7).

  114. Chen N, Song S, Bao X, et al. Update on Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Front Med. 2022;16(6):859–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Selçuk CT, Evsen MS, Ozalp B, et al. Reconstruction of vaginal agenesis with pudendal thigh flaps thinned with liposuction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(9):e246-250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Zhao M, Li P, Li S, et al. Use of autologous micromucosa graft for vaginoplasty in vaginal agenesis. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63(6):645–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Zhao XW, Ma JY, Wang YX, et al. Laparoscopic vaginoplasty using a single peritoneal flap: 10 years of experience in the creation of a neovagina in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(1):241–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Li S, Sun C, Shi B, et al. Laparoscopic vaginoplasty using a sigmoid graft through the umbilical single-incision hybrid transperineal approach: our initial experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24(5):354–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Farzamfar S, Elia E, Richer M, et al. Extracellular Matrix-Based and Electrospun Scaffolding Systems for Vaginal Reconstruction . Bioengineering (Basel), 2023, 10(7).

  120. Zhang Y, Ma Y, Chen J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for vaginal repair in an ovariectomized rhesus macaque model. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):406.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Mason C, Manzotti E. Regenerative medicine cell therapies: numbers of units manufactured and patients treated between 1988 and 2010. Regen Med. 2010;5(3):307–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Zhang H, Zhang J, Huang X, et al. The Methods and Mechanisms to Differentiate Endothelial-Like Cells and Smooth Muscle Cells from Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Vascularization in Vaginal Reconstruction. Mol Biotechnol. 2018;60(6):396–411.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Kasap B, Kasap Ş, Vatansever S, et al. Effects of adipose and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on vaginal atrophy in a rat menopause model. Gene. 2019;711: 143937.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Mao M, Li Y, Zhang Y, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells reconstruct the vaginal wall of ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats: implications for pelvic floor reconstruction. Cell Tissue Res. 2021;386(3):571–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Zakrzewski W, Dobrzyński M, Szymonowicz M, et al. Stem cells: past, present, and future. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Karateke A, Haliloglu B, Parlak O, et al. Intestinal vaginoplasty: seven years’ experience of a tertiary center. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2312–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Mancuso E, Downey C, Doxford-Hook E, et al. The use of polymeric meshes for pelvic organ prolapse: Current concepts, challenges, and future perspectives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020;108(3):771–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Elneil S, Delanerolle G, Zeng Y, et al. Mesh-associated pain syndrome: predictors for continence and prolapse mesh removal surgery in a single centre. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):585.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Wu X, Jia Y, Sun X, et al. Tissue engineering in female pelvic floor reconstruction. Eng Life Sci. 2020;20(7):275–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Yang D, Zhang M, Liu K. Tissue engineering to treat pelvic organ prolapse. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2021;32(16):2118–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Caneparo C, Brownell D, Chabaud S, et al. Genitourinary Tissue Engineering: Reconstruction and Research Models . Bioengineering (Basel), 2021, 8(7).

  132. Paul K, Darzi S, McPhee G, et al. 3D bioprinted endometrial stem cells on melt electrospun poly ε-caprolactone mesh for pelvic floor application promote anti-inflammatory responses in mice. Acta Biomater. 2019;97:162–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Wu X, Wang Y, Zhu C, et al. Preclinical animal study and human clinical trial data of co-electrospun poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) and fibrinogen mesh for anterior pelvic floor reconstruction. Int J Nanomedicine. 2016;11:389–97.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Xiao Y, Zhang J, Tian Y, et al. Vaginal reconstruction with a double-sided biomembrane-a preclinical experimental study on large animals . Biomater Sci, 2023.

  135. Hympánová L, Rynkevic R, Román S, et al. Assessment of Electrospun and Ultra-lightweight Polypropylene Meshes in the Sheep Model for Vaginal Surgery. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(1):190–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Ye M, Yu L, She Y, et al. Healing effects of a protein scaffold loaded with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells on radiation-induced vaginal injury in rats. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(10):300060520958826.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Chang Y, Sun X, Li Q, et al. Silk fibroin scaffold as a potential choice for female pelvic reconstruction: A study on the biocompatibility in abdominal wall, pelvic, and vagina. Microsc Res Tech. 2017;80(3):291–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Liang R, Knight K, Easley D, et al. Towards rebuilding vaginal support utilizing an extracellular matrix bioscaffold. Acta Biomater. 2017;57:324–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Zhang JK, Du RX, Zhang L, et al. A new material for tissue engineered vagina reconstruction: Acellular porcine vagina matrix. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105(7):1949–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Fan X, Wang Y, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of polypropylene mesh and porcine-derived, cross-linked urinary bladder matrix materials implanted in the rabbit vagina and abdomen. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(5):683–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Graphical abstract and figures were created with BioRender.com.

Funding

This work was supported by Clinical Research Incubation Program (no. CYFH202306).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.Z. designed and wrote the manuscript; H.L. designed, supervised and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, D., Li, H. Epidemiology, etiology and treatment of female vaginal injury. Reprod Health 22, 65 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12978-025-02017-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12978-025-02017-x

Keywords